Motianey Says Inflation Has to Come Through

by Adrian Ash on March 10, 2010

“Just allow it…just admit it. It doesn’t matter where the inflation comes from. Just let it stay…”

SLASHING the Bank of England’s base interest rate to an historic low of 0.5% was supposed to “rebalance” the economy…tipping it away from galloping consumption towards an export-led recovery.

But all that the Pound’s slump since rates began sinking in March 2008 has done so far, however, is gift a 50% gain to UK gold owners.

Real UK Bank Base Rates vs. Gold Price in Sterling

“While we were hit with a great recession, we now know that the world has indeed avoided a great depression,” said UK prime minister Gordon Brown at a Reuters press conference in London this morning.

Just as with the war in Iraq, however – another “shock and awe” campaign planned with little thought for the collateral damage – we’ll never know how things would have panned out if brave men like Brown hadn’t done “whatever it takes”. And just like in Iraq, victory has been declared way too early.

New data today showed industrial production in the UK sinking to 1991 levels. The employment rate has sunk back to 1996 levels, meaning a net loss of private-sector work when you allow for Brown’s intervening civil-service jobs jamboree. And despite the collapse in Sterling, the UK’s trade deficit has been widening for more than a year, verging at last count on the record 3% of GDP hit at the very top of the credit bubble, 2005-2008.

“Let us be clear,” says Brown, “the economy is growing, but remains fragile.”

And the cost of this success…?

  • The interest paid on the average cash ISA account now lags retail-price inflation by 3.3 percentage points per year – the worst real returns to cash in over three decades (source: Bank of England and ONS data);
  • Annuity rates have fallen by 6p in the pound, offering barely £6,000 per year on pension savings of £100,000 (source: WilliamBurrows.com);
  • Real wage growth – on average, and after inflation – has gone negative for the first time since 1974, falling well over 1.5% since March 2008 (source: ONS data).

Not quite depleted uranium. But just as insidious.

“In the medium to long term, inflation has to come through,” says Nouriel Roubini’s latest fixed-income hire at RGE Monitor, former Citi managing director and wealth-management strategist, Arun Motianey.

“Just allow it…just admit it. It doesn’t matter where the inflation comes from. It doesn’t have to be through monetization of public-sector deficits, although at a pinch we may need to do that. What I am saying is that if we do get cyclical [demand-driven] inflation, then let that inflation stay…allow it help to write down the real value of debt.”

Naturally, Motianey was talking to CNBC this week because he’s got a book to promote. (We’re all shills in the end, remember.) And naturally, so as to make a few a sales, his policy prescriptions conclude with handy tips for investors on “How do you preserve purchasing power, how do you preserve savings?” amid the inflation which Motianey says we should (and shall) get.

We can have it both ways, in short. Debt can be inflated away, while creditors are somehow protected. I can’t say whether gold bullion is part of his saver’s solution. But when fixed-income economists beg for inflation…and pretend that savers won’t get screwed in the process…you’ve got to wonder where else you can hide.

Adrian Ash
for Money Morning Australia

Adrian Ash is head of research at www.BullionVault.com

VN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 8.8/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Peter Fraser 03.11.10 at 10:32 am

Your headline is misleading. Roubini didn’t say that, but as you correctly state in your article his offsider Motianey did. Actually it was an interesting interview.

Yes inflation would reduce the magnitude of the debt, if it was accompanied with rising wages, AND a lid was kept on more debt, and that would be difficult.

It would also screw savers, which is fine because most of them are in China where they have been keeping the yaun low artificially for years, and thus transferring wealth from the consumer nations.

UN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
UN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
2 Peter Fraser 03.11.10 at 10:33 am

yuan – apologies for my typos.

UN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 1.0/5 (1 vote cast)
UN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
3 ray 03.14.10 at 1:28 am

So China savers deserve to get screwed because they kept the yuan artificially low?
They already have lost out by selling us goods too cheaply – that yuan trick. If they pay their workers more and raise their prices, we would not be able to keep clothed, or afford fancy new technology – we’d be fucked!
Maybe they will be demanding payment in oil or something of value sometime soon?
feel free to edit my post

UN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
UN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
4 Stephen Blowfield 03.14.10 at 9:22 am

WELL ON MY OPINION INFLATION OH A HUGE MAGNITUDE IS THE PROCESS THAT OBVIOUSLY UPONE US FIET MONEY or printed money is all that is left for many Governments of the world. I am constantly amazes at the ignorance of Goverments and its people.In a sene Australia is already Bank Rupt hiding behind its irom ore and its rudeness and lack of dilligence with in the Banking and working community.China however in my opinion is dilligent gets things right and its people have a moral and ethical attitude towards life.

UN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 1.0/5 (1 vote cast)
UN:F [1.7.3_972]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

Leave a Comment

Comment moderation policy: Port Phillip Publishing supports free speech and frank and open conversation. But we reserve the right to modify or delete your comments if we consider them to be offensive or in violation of any laws, including Australia's anti-discrimination laws

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>