- Money Morning Australia

Overt and Covert Counterfeiting – A Lesson in Central Banking

Written on 04 October 2010 by Kris Sayce

Overt and Covert Counterfeiting – A Lesson in Central Banking

More dark and dastardly goings-on by the world’s central bankers.

And I’m not just referring to the corrupt money-printing taking place at the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) money printing agency Securency.

You may have read the odd story or two about what Securency has been up to. Accusations have been made that it has bribed foreign officials in order to win contracts for its polymer bank note business – such as the plastic Australian notes you use each day.

Even RBA officials have been drawn into the fire with accusations that current RBA chief, Glenn Stevens, “helped lobby Indonesia’s central bank for a bank note printing contract”.

Mr. Stevens was deputy governor of the RBA at the time.

In today’s The Age, the paper runs with the headline, “RBA counterfeiting claim”.

The paper says:

“The Reserve Bank of Australia’s currency firm, Securency, produced millions of partly made foreign banknotes without authorisation from overseas central banks, in a practice described by former staff as effective counterfeiting.”

We’ll make a point here. It’s not “effective counterfeiting”, it is counterfeiting.

Isn’t it a shame that the mainstream press still can’t make the connection between unauthorised printing of paper money and authorised printing of paper money.

Because if they put their ant-sized brains to the task they’d soon figure out that not only is unauthorised printing of paper money a counterfeit job, but even the authorised printing of money is fraudulent.

Furthermore, they’d figure out that a central bank doesn’t even need to print actual bank notes in order to counterfeit money. It can just add it to the bottom line with a click of a mouse.

And even better for the central bankers is that they can get the retail banks to do the dirty work for them, thanks to fractional reserve banking. That’s where banks entice people to deposit money and then then it lends out to other customers using the savers’ money as collateral.

It’s counterfeiting because even though the savers’ cash has supposedly been loaned out for to a borrower, the saver still has the ability to withdraw their deposit without any need for the borrower to repay the loan.

How’s that possible unless new money is created from thin air?

But given how Securency seems to operate its business, we’re surprised The Age didn’t print what it really thinks rather than skirting around the edges. To us it seems clear. Why else would a money printer print counterfeit foreign currency unless it planned to use that currency in it’s [ahem] business dealings…

In other words, backhanded payments, bribes or the new term that everyone likes to use, graft. It all means the same thing, political corruption.

I mean, after all, why bribe someone by exchanging Aussie dollars for the foreign currency when you can just print as much of the foreign currency as you like? It’s pretty easy when you control the printing presses…

But of course, counterfeiting currencies isn’t unique to Australia. The US Federal Reserve is all over it at the moment.

Today’s Australian Financial Review reports that:

“One of the US Federal Reserve’s most influential officials has publicly thrown his weight behind another round of asset purchases, warning the current economic situation facing the US is ‘wholly unacceptable.’”

What is it that New York Fed president William Dudley – the successor to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner – finds so “wholly unacceptable”?

He explains:

“I conclude further [monetary] action is likely to be warranted unless the economic outlook evolves in a way that makes me more confident that we will see better outcomes for both employment and inflation before too long.”

It won’t surprise you to learn that the better outcome for inflation is higher inflation.

In the world of central banking, inflation is good. You know that, we’ve told you a hundred times before that’s how the central bankers, retail bankers and the mainstream view inflation.

But Dudley isn’t the only one to complain about low inflation. Boston Fed president Eric Rosengren told The Forecasters Club of New York last week that:

“While it’s clear to everyone why a high unemployment rate is a problem, one of the reasons we worry about a too-low rate of inflation is that the closer to zero the inflation rate gets, the greater the risk it could fall into a harmful deflation.”

We won’t cover old ground by pointing out the fallacy about the fears of deflation. We’ve written about this several times over the past couple of years.

But the fact is, deflation is only bad if you’re hocked up to the eyeballs, or if you’re the one doing the lending.

And seeing as the Fed – and every other central bank – is supposed to be the lender of last resort, the last thing the Fed wants is for it to actually have to be the lender of last resort. Doing so would expose to the world that it doesn’t have the capital to meet that obligation.

Not without printing more money that is.

Hence why the Fed is so keen to induce inflation. That way the retail banks can counterfeit their way out of the debt bubble rather than facing the prospect of overtly going bankrupt.

The reverse side of this of course is that while it saves the bankers, it destroys everyone else – people are encouraged to keep spending 50% and 60% of their salaries to pay off a debt when they would have been better off defaulting.

And at the same time they don’t realise their wealth and wages are being eroded over time as inflation takes its dastardly toll. That means you have to work harder and longer in order to receive the same wage.

Yes friend, we’re sure a valid case can be made that it wasn’t the women’s lib movement that helped draw more women into the workforce, but rather it was the inflationary policies of central bankers that forced women to enter the workforce because families were finding it increasingly hard to live on just one income.

Who’d have thunk it? Men in pinstriped suits doing more for feminism than the Suffragettes! What d’ya think of that, sister?

Anyhoo, it’s worth noting a chart Mr. Rosengren used in his speech. It was this one:

Federal Funds Effective Rate: Actual and According to the Taylor Rule


The red line shows where the US Fed Funds rate would be if it wasn’t for what’s known as the zero bound.

The zero bound simply means that a central bank can’t have an official negative interest rate policy. Doing so would mean the bank would charge customers to deposit money.

Think about it this way. It would be the equivalent of Commonwealth Bank charging you, for instance, 5% per year for you to deposit your savings in an account with them.

Now, that’s not to say that it doesn’t cost you money to deposit money with a bank. Once you add on monthly fees we’re sure plenty of people do pay to store their money in a bank – we won’t get on to the subject of whether paying for storage is a good thing or not, that’s for another day.

But can you imagine seeing an ad from the CBA telling you it will only cost you 5% a year to deposit your cash? It would hardly have savers busting the doors down to give them their money.

That’s why the central bankers have to go about it in an underhanded and deceitful way.

What it ultimately means is that a negative interest rate is a tax on savers. It penalises savers for having money.

But it’s not a tax in that you’re only taxed on the income produced from the savings. A negative interest rate involves deducting from the principal. It means a saver depositing $100, but only getting $95 back a year later.

What this chart does is give away the game. It reveals to one and all what the Fed’s real policy position is.

The Fed knows it can’t overtly tax savers by giving them back less than they paid in. So that’s why the Fed – and other central banks – choose to go about it fraudulently, by not telling people what they’re really doing.

Because of this, as Mr. Rosengren notes:

“Constrained by the zero bound, the Federal Reserve utilized less conventional policies…”

He then showed another chart, showing the extent of the unconventional policies:

Federal Reserve System Assets: Selected Temporary Operations


This chart shows how the Fed had to pump liquidity into the economy by buying up a whole bunch of worthless assets.

You can see how the chart jumps from somewhere around USD$50 billion in early October 2008 to over USD$1 trillion just a month or so later.

The reality is that it didn’t really matter what the Fed was buying. That was just the beard, the cover, the disguise. All the Fed really wanted to do was push more new money into the economy to make sure most banks didn’t fail and so that its inability to fulfil its promise of being the lender of last resort wasn’t exposed.

The upshot is that by pumping the extra liquidity into the market, the Fed has achieved its negative interest rate goal. If negative interest rates involve charging savers on deposited money, then devaluing savers’ money by increasing the money supply does exactly the same thing.

Mr. Rosengren from the Boston Fed confirms this with his chart. He confirms that it’s central bank policy to devalue the currency in order to save the bankers.

And they’re doing it in cruel, dishonest and underhanded way.

Which, when you look at how the RBA and Securency have behaved, appears to be pretty much par for the course when it comes to the world’s central bankers.


Kris Sayce

For Money Morning Australia

Already a subscriber to Money Morning... or simply, just like what you're reading? Then show your support and spread the word...
Share this post on...

Kris Sayce
Kris is never one to pull punches when discussing market developments and economic events that can affect your wealth. He’ll take anyone to task — banks, governments, big business — if he thinks they’re trying to pull a fast one with your money. Kris is also the investment director for Australian Small-Cap Investigator, Diggers and Drillers and Revolutionary Tech Investor. If you’d like to more about Kris’ financial world view and investing philosophy then join him on Google+. It's where he shares investment insight, commentary and ideas that he can't always fit into his regular Money Morning essays. Read more about Publisher and Investment Director Kris Sayce.

Leave a Comment

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.

If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to moneymorning@moneymorning.com.au

6 Comments For This Post

  1. KP Says:

    “”I mean, after all, why bribe someone by exchanging Aussie dollars for the foreign currency when you can just print as much of the foreign currency as you like?”"

    Love it!!! Here you are El Presidento, a million dollars worth of samples of the banknotes we could print for you…

    I assume Govts do this all the time… Foreign aid… Just print $20mil in Niras for me please. Buying new jet fighters…. here, rush off half a billion of these US notes for us will you….

    Nothing like a monopoly on making monopoly money is there? Stopping anyone else from printing “Legal Tender” gave the Govt complete control of our lives.

  2. bb Says:

    Everyone knows that whoever gets to be ‘the banker’ during a wet afternoon of a tedious game of monopoly always seem to mysteriously win!

  3. cb Says:

    Well, that indicates only one thing: An inbuilt advantage.
    Keiser Report: Gold Price Nice for Crooks

  4. Nick Says:

    “Securitised Mortgage Debt …NOT WORTH THE PAPER IT’S WRITTEN ON …”

    “Racketeering suits (RICO), now as civil class action suits in two states, have hit the nail on the head. The civil suit says the banks do not have proper title to the homes on which they are foreclosing. This by direct inference questions if securitized debt on mortgages have real collateral behind them.
    Simply stated a long time ago by Marie Mcdonnell and myself, THEY DO NOT.
    That means legacy assets are cooked, dead, and worthless, yet are now marked up in value to cost and above. This is all thanks to FASB’s capitulation that now represents a large amount of capital for the Western world’s financial entities.
    The you know what hit the fan today for those that understand. October 4th 2010, the essence of securitized debt on mortgages died!”


  5. Beauner Says:

    The Commonwealth of Australia is a Corporation, registered in the USA??????

    “COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA registered in the



    CIK (0000805157)

    SIC: 8880 – American Depositary Receipts

    State location: DC | Fiscal Year End: 0630

    Business Address



    WASHINGTON DC 20036″


  6. Beauner Says:

    Come on, where the hell are you guys — I need to know if anyone knows this, or can verify this information!

GET THIS NEW REPORT : 5 Things You Can Do To Boost Your Retirement Pot

In this report we’ll give you strategies, tips and advice to help you kick-start, or revive your retirement savings right now.

PLUS you'll get Money Morning every weekday...absolutely free.

Enter your email address below and hit the 'Claim My Free Report' button now.

Privacy Statement
We will collect and handle your personal information in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
You can cancel your subscription at any time

Diggers and Drillers

A 3-Point Plan to Re-Engage with the Aussie Mining Boom

This new video reveals a way for Aussie share investors like you to RE-ENGAGE with the next phase of the mining boom…while valuations are still dirt-cheap…

The plan centres round three specific stocks.

To find out what they are, click here.

Australian Small-Cap Investigator

The Australian wildcatter
exploring oil's 'final frontier'

The US Geological Survey says this area contains up to 71 billion barrels of oil.

Only a few explorers have secured licences to drill.

One of them is a daring little Aussie firm that begins drilling 'in early 2014'.

According to small-cap analysts Tim Dohrmann it's impossible to speculate just how high this one could go. Find out why here.

World War D

Couldn’t make it to our
‘War Summit’?

Don’t sweat it. Click here for the next best thing…

World War D was the most important meeting of minds of the decade so far. What came out of it will almost certainly force you to reshape your investment plan for the rest of the decade. There's no way to go back in time and get inside the Savoy Ballroom of the Grand Hyatt.

But you can do the next best thing…
to find out what it is, click here.

  • ^NDX3557.036-31.769 - -0.89%
  • ^FTSE6674.74-7.02 - -0.11%
  • ^AORD5520.500+18.300 - +0.33%
  • ^AXJO5536.400+18.600 - +0.34%
  • AUDUSD=X0.9293
  • USDJPY=X102.525

Graphic Ad 1 – Blue Chip Stocks Report

Revolutionary Tech Investor

This report is about TECH MOON-SHOTS

Four of them, to be precise.

It's an early-days project. But one biotech aiming for the cancer moon-shot is already up - get this - 497.14% since tipped.

For four more tech moon-shots, click here.

Gowdie Family Wealth

The worst mistake you can make when handing wealth on to your kids

This brand new investor briefing shows you what your family’s in for if you don’t take care to leave your wealth to them in exactly the right way.

And it shows you precisely how to prevent infighting, recklessness and misunderstanding over money.

Read it here.

The Money For Life Letter

Holden. Toyota. Qantas. BUST

Do you really expect the share market to boom in times like these? That's why Nick Hubble says the best thing you can do right now is invest for safety and income.

This brand new video shows you how you can get predictable, reliable and rock solid cash flow no matter what happens in the wider economy.

You could lock in up to $20,000 a year - and that's just the start. See how here.

Sound Money. Sound Investments. [bullish prediction]

Greg Canavan's first bullish prediction in four years

Greg Canavan
doesn't make forecasts like this often.

When he does, it's because he’s found something that could make you money for years to come.

Read more here.

Is the Australian Housing Boom Really Back?

The Denning Report

2014 Predicted

Dan Denning accurately forecast 2013's flight from
bonds to stocks, the commodities crash and the
Aussie dollar top…to the exact week

In this brand new forecast report, he shares his
three critical predictions for 2014…

More Recommended Reading Below...

The Pursuit of Happiness & The Daily Reckoning

  • The Pursuit of Happiness
  • The Daily Reckoning Australia

Two days from now Australia will get a taste for what happens in American sports stadiums every day [Read More...]

Would you approve this chemical? Would you allow this to come to market? Table salt would simply not [Read More...]

If these lessons can be passed onto the next generation, what a world it would be. Healthier, genuin [Read More...]

3D printing is changing medicine, consumer products, art and manufacturing. The impact it’s having o [Read More...]

Done properly, a retirement business can not only help fill a retiree’s time and replace their work [Read More...]

A high Australian dollar means we’re doing well at exporting. A low one means our trade balance is l [Read More...]

From the invasion of the Philippines to the Vietnam War…the US empire was financed by the rich, prod [Read More...]

China's economy has mightily affected the rest of the world. We will just have to be patient as [Read More...]

For us the pension and Superannuation crisis is all about demographics and ageing. It doesn’t really [Read More...]

Coming off successes in Iraq and Afghanistan, it makes sense that the US should send troops to Ukrai [Read More...]


"I think you're fantastic! I love to read what you write...you're so interesting and amusing and I've learned so much" -
Money Morning reader, Chris Gadd

"You guys are brilliant. I feel more relaxed about the future than ever simply because I know what is going on rather than floundering around with smoke screens and mirrors from the government and mainstream" -
Money Morning reader, Helen Carter

"Wow what can I say? I was an economically confused moron until I read your newsletter and even though I've been a subscriber for a short period I can now see how easy it is to understand, if you use common sense and can have the spin translated into everyday language. Thanks for an entertaining read." -
Money Morning reader, John

"Keep up the good independent and well thought out articles offering a view that often debunks mainstream myths." -
Money Morning reader, Craig

"I do admire your straight talking and simple analysis of the situation, I think of you as the Jeremy Clarkson of finance." -
Money Morning reader, Jeffery