- Money Morning Australia

Overt and Covert Counterfeiting – A Lesson in Central Banking


Written on 04 October 2010 by Kris Sayce

Overt and Covert Counterfeiting – A Lesson in Central Banking

More dark and dastardly goings-on by the world’s central bankers.

And I’m not just referring to the corrupt money-printing taking place at the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) money printing agency Securency.

You may have read the odd story or two about what Securency has been up to. Accusations have been made that it has bribed foreign officials in order to win contracts for its polymer bank note business – such as the plastic Australian notes you use each day.

Even RBA officials have been drawn into the fire with accusations that current RBA chief, Glenn Stevens, “helped lobby Indonesia’s central bank for a bank note printing contract”.

Mr. Stevens was deputy governor of the RBA at the time.

In today’s The Age, the paper runs with the headline, “RBA counterfeiting claim”.

The paper says:

“The Reserve Bank of Australia’s currency firm, Securency, produced millions of partly made foreign banknotes without authorisation from overseas central banks, in a practice described by former staff as effective counterfeiting.”

We’ll make a point here. It’s not “effective counterfeiting”, it is counterfeiting.

Isn’t it a shame that the mainstream press still can’t make the connection between unauthorised printing of paper money and authorised printing of paper money.

Because if they put their ant-sized brains to the task they’d soon figure out that not only is unauthorised printing of paper money a counterfeit job, but even the authorised printing of money is fraudulent.

Furthermore, they’d figure out that a central bank doesn’t even need to print actual bank notes in order to counterfeit money. It can just add it to the bottom line with a click of a mouse.

And even better for the central bankers is that they can get the retail banks to do the dirty work for them, thanks to fractional reserve banking. That’s where banks entice people to deposit money and then then it lends out to other customers using the savers’ money as collateral.

It’s counterfeiting because even though the savers’ cash has supposedly been loaned out for to a borrower, the saver still has the ability to withdraw their deposit without any need for the borrower to repay the loan.

How’s that possible unless new money is created from thin air?

But given how Securency seems to operate its business, we’re surprised The Age didn’t print what it really thinks rather than skirting around the edges. To us it seems clear. Why else would a money printer print counterfeit foreign currency unless it planned to use that currency in it’s [ahem] business dealings…

In other words, backhanded payments, bribes or the new term that everyone likes to use, graft. It all means the same thing, political corruption.

I mean, after all, why bribe someone by exchanging Aussie dollars for the foreign currency when you can just print as much of the foreign currency as you like? It’s pretty easy when you control the printing presses…

But of course, counterfeiting currencies isn’t unique to Australia. The US Federal Reserve is all over it at the moment.

Today’s Australian Financial Review reports that:

“One of the US Federal Reserve’s most influential officials has publicly thrown his weight behind another round of asset purchases, warning the current economic situation facing the US is ‘wholly unacceptable.’”

What is it that New York Fed president William Dudley – the successor to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner – finds so “wholly unacceptable”?

He explains:

“I conclude further [monetary] action is likely to be warranted unless the economic outlook evolves in a way that makes me more confident that we will see better outcomes for both employment and inflation before too long.”

It won’t surprise you to learn that the better outcome for inflation is higher inflation.

In the world of central banking, inflation is good. You know that, we’ve told you a hundred times before that’s how the central bankers, retail bankers and the mainstream view inflation.

But Dudley isn’t the only one to complain about low inflation. Boston Fed president Eric Rosengren told The Forecasters Club of New York last week that:

“While it’s clear to everyone why a high unemployment rate is a problem, one of the reasons we worry about a too-low rate of inflation is that the closer to zero the inflation rate gets, the greater the risk it could fall into a harmful deflation.”

We won’t cover old ground by pointing out the fallacy about the fears of deflation. We’ve written about this several times over the past couple of years.

But the fact is, deflation is only bad if you’re hocked up to the eyeballs, or if you’re the one doing the lending.

And seeing as the Fed – and every other central bank – is supposed to be the lender of last resort, the last thing the Fed wants is for it to actually have to be the lender of last resort. Doing so would expose to the world that it doesn’t have the capital to meet that obligation.

Not without printing more money that is.

Hence why the Fed is so keen to induce inflation. That way the retail banks can counterfeit their way out of the debt bubble rather than facing the prospect of overtly going bankrupt.

The reverse side of this of course is that while it saves the bankers, it destroys everyone else – people are encouraged to keep spending 50% and 60% of their salaries to pay off a debt when they would have been better off defaulting.

And at the same time they don’t realise their wealth and wages are being eroded over time as inflation takes its dastardly toll. That means you have to work harder and longer in order to receive the same wage.

Yes friend, we’re sure a valid case can be made that it wasn’t the women’s lib movement that helped draw more women into the workforce, but rather it was the inflationary policies of central bankers that forced women to enter the workforce because families were finding it increasingly hard to live on just one income.

Who’d have thunk it? Men in pinstriped suits doing more for feminism than the Suffragettes! What d’ya think of that, sister?

Anyhoo, it’s worth noting a chart Mr. Rosengren used in his speech. It was this one:

Federal Funds Effective Rate: Actual and According to the Taylor Rule

 

The red line shows where the US Fed Funds rate would be if it wasn’t for what’s known as the zero bound.

The zero bound simply means that a central bank can’t have an official negative interest rate policy. Doing so would mean the bank would charge customers to deposit money.

Think about it this way. It would be the equivalent of Commonwealth Bank charging you, for instance, 5% per year for you to deposit your savings in an account with them.

Now, that’s not to say that it doesn’t cost you money to deposit money with a bank. Once you add on monthly fees we’re sure plenty of people do pay to store their money in a bank – we won’t get on to the subject of whether paying for storage is a good thing or not, that’s for another day.

But can you imagine seeing an ad from the CBA telling you it will only cost you 5% a year to deposit your cash? It would hardly have savers busting the doors down to give them their money.

That’s why the central bankers have to go about it in an underhanded and deceitful way.

What it ultimately means is that a negative interest rate is a tax on savers. It penalises savers for having money.

But it’s not a tax in that you’re only taxed on the income produced from the savings. A negative interest rate involves deducting from the principal. It means a saver depositing $100, but only getting $95 back a year later.

What this chart does is give away the game. It reveals to one and all what the Fed’s real policy position is.

The Fed knows it can’t overtly tax savers by giving them back less than they paid in. So that’s why the Fed – and other central banks – choose to go about it fraudulently, by not telling people what they’re really doing.

Because of this, as Mr. Rosengren notes:

“Constrained by the zero bound, the Federal Reserve utilized less conventional policies…”

He then showed another chart, showing the extent of the unconventional policies:

Federal Reserve System Assets: Selected Temporary Operations

 

This chart shows how the Fed had to pump liquidity into the economy by buying up a whole bunch of worthless assets.

You can see how the chart jumps from somewhere around USD$50 billion in early October 2008 to over USD$1 trillion just a month or so later.

The reality is that it didn’t really matter what the Fed was buying. That was just the beard, the cover, the disguise. All the Fed really wanted to do was push more new money into the economy to make sure most banks didn’t fail and so that its inability to fulfil its promise of being the lender of last resort wasn’t exposed.

The upshot is that by pumping the extra liquidity into the market, the Fed has achieved its negative interest rate goal. If negative interest rates involve charging savers on deposited money, then devaluing savers’ money by increasing the money supply does exactly the same thing.

Mr. Rosengren from the Boston Fed confirms this with his chart. He confirms that it’s central bank policy to devalue the currency in order to save the bankers.

And they’re doing it in cruel, dishonest and underhanded way.

Which, when you look at how the RBA and Securency have behaved, appears to be pretty much par for the course when it comes to the world’s central bankers.

Cheers.

Kris Sayce

For Money Morning Australia



Already a subscriber to Money Morning... or simply, just like what you're reading? Then show your support and spread the word...
Share this post on...
Share

Kris Sayce
Kris is never one to pull punches when discussing market developments and economic events that can affect your wealth. He’ll take anyone to task — banks, governments, big business — if he thinks they’re trying to pull a fast one with your money. Kris is also the investment director for Australian Small-Cap Investigator, Diggers and Drillers and Revolutionary Tech Investor. If you’d like to more about Kris’ financial world view and investing philosophy then join him on Google+. It's where he shares investment insight, commentary and ideas that he can't always fit into his regular Money Morning essays. Read more about Publisher and Investment Director Kris Sayce.

Leave a Comment

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.

If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to moneymorning@moneymorning.com.au


6 Comments For This Post

  1. KP Says:

    “”I mean, after all, why bribe someone by exchanging Aussie dollars for the foreign currency when you can just print as much of the foreign currency as you like?””

    Love it!!! Here you are El Presidento, a million dollars worth of samples of the banknotes we could print for you…

    I assume Govts do this all the time… Foreign aid… Just print $20mil in Niras for me please. Buying new jet fighters…. here, rush off half a billion of these US notes for us will you….

    Nothing like a monopoly on making monopoly money is there? Stopping anyone else from printing “Legal Tender” gave the Govt complete control of our lives.

  2. bb Says:

    Everyone knows that whoever gets to be ‘the banker’ during a wet afternoon of a tedious game of monopoly always seem to mysteriously win!

  3. cb Says:

    Well, that indicates only one thing: An inbuilt advantage.
    Keiser Report: Gold Price Nice for Crooks
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2RAqrN-ln4&feature=player_embedded

  4. Nick Says:

    “Securitised Mortgage Debt …NOT WORTH THE PAPER IT’S WRITTEN ON …”

    “Racketeering suits (RICO), now as civil class action suits in two states, have hit the nail on the head. The civil suit says the banks do not have proper title to the homes on which they are foreclosing. This by direct inference questions if securitized debt on mortgages have real collateral behind them.
    Simply stated a long time ago by Marie Mcdonnell and myself, THEY DO NOT.
    That means legacy assets are cooked, dead, and worthless, yet are now marked up in value to cost and above. This is all thanks to FASB’s capitulation that now represents a large amount of capital for the Western world’s financial entities.
    The you know what hit the fan today for those that understand. October 4th 2010, the essence of securitized debt on mortgages died!”

    http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C13F33A2-C7A1-4FD1-A80C-A058706150FD/

  5. Beauner Says:

    The Commonwealth of Australia is a Corporation, registered in the USA??????

    “COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA registered in the

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION as CIK (0000805157).

    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

    CIK (0000805157)

    SIC: 8880 – American Depositary Receipts

    State location: DC | Fiscal Year End: 0630

    Business Address

    1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW

    C/O AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY

    WASHINGTON DC 20036″

    http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/uk_australia_canada_government/news.php?q=1208891171

  6. Beauner Says:

    Come on, where the hell are you guys — I need to know if anyone knows this, or can verify this information!



GET THIS NEW REPORT : 5 Things You Can Do To Boost Your Retirement Pot


In this report we’ll give you strategies, tips and advice to help you kick-start, or revive your retirement savings right now.

PLUS you'll get Money Morning every weekday...absolutely free.

Enter your email address below and hit the 'Claim My Free Report' button now.

Privacy Statement
We will collect and handle your personal information in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
You can cancel your subscription at any time

New Frontier Investor

The last investment megatrend birthed stock gains of 11,095%, 20,621% and 50,760% over 20 to 40 years.

If Kris Sayce is right, gains from this next megatrend won’t just reach those heights...

They’ll SURPASS them...

To see why, click here.

Iron ore leadgen

  • ^NDX3961.623+27.487 - +0.70%
  • ^FTSE6795.34+66.90 - +0.99%
  • ^AORD5553.600+19.600 - +0.35%
  • ^AXJO5563.100+19.800 - +0.36%
  • AUDUSD=X0.9387
  • USDJPY=X101.525

The Denning Report

‘The era when the US was a
superpower has ended. We need
to protect ourselves’

Japanese Politician Takaya Muto


A quiet war in the Pacific has begun. The key combatants are the US, China and Japan. And WE are trapped in the crossfire.


In this brand new special report Dan Denning details three reasons why Australia is losing control of its future...and a three-part investment strategy you can use to protect your wealth and PROFIT


LEARN MORE HERE

interest rates leadgen

Australian Small-Cap Investigator

Why Holden’s future lies
beneath the soil in
Tasmania…

 
And not just the future of Holden…but Toyota,
Hyundai and Mazda too


CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL STORY

investing success leadgen

Phil Anderson Cycles, Trends and Forecasts

‘This man can see the future…’

In 2003, when America was at war and CNN was warning of a ‘double-dip recession’, he was buying small cap stocks right at the bottom...

Also in 2003, Australian newspapers were full of headlines warning of a looming property crash, he said nonsense, and that Australian property would boom for years to come...

In 2011, when everyone thought the euro was history, he said ‘the euro is not going to collapse... Greece will NEVER be permitted to default...’

Simply: this man can see things others can’t.

To find out who he is, and what he’s forecasting right now, click here.

Resource Sector leadgen

Gowdie Family Wealth

Which type of family are you?


  1. The kind that ends up in court
    battling over inheritance money…

  2. Or the kind that knows how to
    protect, pass on and grow wealth forever.

Click here if you want the kind of family
that grows its wealth for generations.

Diggers and Drillers [BANNER]

The Money For Life Letter

A giant wrecking ball is about to smash Australia’s retirement system to smithereens...
 
And unless you take the evasive action outlined in this Special Issue, everything you’ve saved and invested over your whole working life could soon be GROUND to DUST.
 
Click here to read.

Gold Stock leadgen

Revolutionary Tech Investor

IMAGINE THIS SCENARIO....


You decide to buy a share on the stock market.

The company, on face value, is run by lunatics.

Their business plan is madness.


It's only 48 cents. What the hell?


You whack ten grand into it.


Ten years later that $10k is worth just shy of
TWELVE MILLION DOLLARS.


Welcome to the Moon-Shot Club!

Graphic Ad 1 – Blue Chip Stocks Report


More Recommended Reading Below...

The Pursuit of Happiness & The Daily Reckoning

  • The Pursuit of Happiness
  • The Daily Reckoning Australia

New Zealand may not be an emerging market, but it’s highly leveraged to growth in emerging markets. [Read More...]

Clearly, illegal immigrants are a headache for the government. But rather than store them on Christm [Read More...]

Don’t fear the swan. But don’t be complacent either. Acknowledge and respect that black swan events [Read More...]

Education was one of the most pressing concerns at the World Future Conference. Our education system [Read More...]

As our personas become ever more digital, our social capital online will be equally important. We ar [Read More...]

Russia and its supporters have nothing to gain from attacking civilians. Russia and Putin were winni [Read More...]

This morning the Australian dollar is trading for 93.9 US cents. It hasn't managed to regain pa [Read More...]

While Australian investors continue to hold most of their share investments in local stocks, they ar [Read More...]

Investors can't consistently choose good investments; because they don't know the future. [Read More...]

Stock markets around the world keep going up. Australia's stock market keeps going sideways. Th [Read More...]

TESTIMONIALS

"I think you're fantastic! I love to read what you write...you're so interesting and amusing and I've learned so much" -
Money Morning reader, Chris Gadd

"You guys are brilliant. I feel more relaxed about the future than ever simply because I know what is going on rather than floundering around with smoke screens and mirrors from the government and mainstream" -
Money Morning reader, Helen Carter

"Wow what can I say? I was an economically confused moron until I read your newsletter and even though I've been a subscriber for a short period I can now see how easy it is to understand, if you use common sense and can have the spin translated into everyday language. Thanks for an entertaining read." -
Money Morning reader, John

"Keep up the good independent and well thought out articles offering a view that often debunks mainstream myths." -
Money Morning reader, Craig

"I do admire your straight talking and simple analysis of the situation, I think of you as the Jeremy Clarkson of finance." -
Money Morning reader, Jeffery