In today’s Money Morning: An error corrected… The year’s worst housing bubble story… Marvellous water views… and cars and lithium…
Why it Won’t Take a Shock to Knock House Prices for Six
Yesterday we made a most terrible error. We left out a ’t. When advising you to look after your bars of gold, we should have written:
“Just make sure you’ve got a safe place to keep it where the government can’t get hold of it should the Governor-General ever activate Part IV of the Banking Act.”
Hopefully that clears things up.
We thought housing articles couldn’t get any worse after reading the effort from HSBC’s Paul Bloxham last week.
But oh boy. We were wrong.
The Sydney Morning Herald’s Jessica Irvine has knocked out what is, in our opinion, the year’s worst housing bubble article – that’s a big claim when it’s still only March!
But it’s hardly surprising, seeing as much of the material appears to have been drawn from Mr. Bloxham’s half-baked effort last week. After all, if you take a badly baked cake and mix it up, what are you left with? That’s right, an even worse cake.
There’s no point taking apart the entire article, because as I say, it’s largely a rehash of Mr. Bloxham’s effort.
But I will go over a couple of points. I know, maybe it gets a little boring covering old ground. But as long as the mainstream press and banking insiders keep printing the same old drivel, I’ll keep printing rebuttals.
So if you’ve had enough of housing bubbles, give this section a miss and scroll down to see what Aaron Tyrrell has to say about cars and lithium.
Marvellous water views
If you’re still with me, let’s take a look at some of the schoolgirl errors made by Ms. Irvine:
Ms. Irvine backs Mr. Bloxham’s claim that Aussie houses are better quality than those overseas. Not surprisingly, no proof is given. Where is the data to prove this?
Then Ms Irvine claims Aussies houses have “marvellous water views”! And that’s why high prices are justified. What on earth does that have to do with anything? If “marvellous water views” are a house price crash preventer, then surely a lack of “marvellous water views” is a house price bubble preventer.
Yet the lack of “marvellous water views” didn’t stop house prices in Arizona forming a bubble.
Yes, people may desire a water view, but it doesn’t mean houses with water views can never be overpriced. The same dynamic of excessive credit and the belief that prices can never fall has played out in houses with and without views.
In fact, based on some of the discounting that’s happened among prime Sydney apartments on the Harbour, we’d say those properties with a “marvellous water view” are likely to be hit the hardest.
But those are just trivial things. Things she may now regret writing. Of more interest is the following comment:
“You see, house prices only fall when people are forced to sell their homes. Otherwise, households choose to simply remain in their home and wait things out. Property investors are loath to realise their capital loss.
“A true collapse in house prices would indeed require some large external shock – a doubling of unemployment or interest rates – to trigger the wave of forced home sales that it would take to provoke house price falls.”
Not true. People buy and sell houses all the time. People upsize and downsize. If someone wants to sell, they’ll sell… not just when they’re forced to.
All that’s required for house prices to fall is for people to think that house prices will fall. Just in the same way that share prices can fall when they reach a peak. Sellers look to get out first before everyone else gets the same idea.
But because it can take so long to sell a house, the stock of housing on the market can build up quickly. And before sellers know it, they’re no longer the only house on the street for sale… they’ve got competition. And as you know, in all areas of an economy, competition tends to drive down prices.
And let me tell you something, there’s a whole bunch of competition on the market right now.
Competition among sellers
This week SQM Research sent out its latest analysis of housing stock on the market. As you’ll see in the table below, there’s been a huge increase in the number of houses up for sale:
In fact nationally there has been a 46% increase in the supply of housing for sale, compared to the same time last year… 46%!
Talk about a housing glut…forget the housing shortage lies. Australia has a huge excess of housing. Incidentally, we did hear our old pal Peter Switzer banging on about the housing shortage last night on Sky Business Channel… it seems you can’t keep a good excuse down.
But what will the glut do to prices? That’s right, push them down thanks to increased competition. I can picture buyers now, “Why should I pay $500k for your house when there’s one down the road for $480k…”
Forget “large external shocks”, or a “doubling of unemployment or interest rates”, all it needs is increased competition… and we’ve got it.
But Ms. Irvine also ignores the fact that different sellers are in different circumstances. Someone who bought a house for $100k, may be happy to accept $300k, whereas someone who bought for $350k may not be so happy.
But that won’t stop the first house from selling. And it won’t stop house prices from falling just because someone chooses to hold out for a higher price – which may never arrive if buyers can get something similar for cheaper.
You see, the idea that something major has to happen in order for prices to fall is nonsense. There doesn’t need to be a big bang catalyst to spark a house price rout.
All that’s needed is for the fundamentals of supply, demand, price and quantity to play out. And that’s happening right now.
Interest rates are up 20%
But what about the idea that interest rates need to double? Not true. When interest rates are kept artificially low, it sucks in a whole bunch of borrowers. Those that wouldn’t otherwise have borrowed are drawn into the market.
As with anything, artificially low interest rates create malinvestments.
And as Ms. Irvine correctly points out, it encourages lower lending standards too.
Because so many borrowers have been sucked in on low interest rates, it distorts the market. But at some point the demand for borrowing will begin to dry up, and investors who would otherwise have put savings in the bank will look elsewhere for higher returns.
That creates a problem for a Ponzi banking system. Banks need to keep filling the hopper. They need more deposits and more borrowing to keep the Ponzi finance flowing.
When that slows down – as it has – the banks need to raise interest rates. Simply so they can encourage savers to deposit money, or to encourage investors to buy their bonds.
Remember all the crazy offers the banks were making to attract deposits last year? Yeah, of course you do. That’s Ponzi finance in action. It was an indicator of the market starting to tip over.
But here’s the thing. If the bank has lowered its lending standards and kept interest rates low for too long, interest rates only have to rise marginally in order for it to have a big impact on borrowers.
It’s just like leveraged investing. It works great when things are going your way… and… not so great when things are going against you.
For instance, the ANZ Bank reckons the median house price is $559,000. Let’s say someone has taken out an 80% mortgage, borrowing $447,200. An interest rate of 5% would mean repayments of $2,401 per month.
But should the interest rate increase to 7%, repayments increase to $2,976 per month.
That’s an extra $575 per month of after-tax money.
And if interest rates go to 8%, then you’re looking at monthly repayments of $3,282… an extra $881 per month.
“Oh, that won’t happen,” the spruikers say. Really? Too late, we’re almost there. Mortgage interest rates got down to about 5% in 2008. Today they’re above 7%. And that’s why prices are on the way down. That’s about a 20% increase from the low point.
“Oh, but people are ahead on their mortgages, the RBA says so.” Don’t trust those figures too much. Sure, plenty of people would have gotten ahead on their mortgages. Especially as interest rates dropped in 2008 and 2009. But trust me, it won’t take long for that benefit to be wiped out.
Not when repayments are an extra $700 or $800 per month.
And don’t forget, those that are ahead are those that had mortgages prior to 2008… before interest rates were cut. Those that were suckered in by the first-home buyer’s bribe won’t have any buffer, because they were conned into borrowing as much as they could afford, just at the point when interest rates were at the low.
Any interest rate increase will hurt them harder. Each 0.25% rise in interest rates is an increase of 5% increase for someone who took out a mortgage when rates were at 5%.
Whereas it’s only a 3.5% increase for someone who took out a mortgage with rates at 7%. Believe me, it may not seem like much, but it makes a whole lot of difference when you’ve overextended yourself with a giant mortgage.
Unemployment may be higher than you think
But what about the unemployment rate. Again, don’t get too excited. Sure, the unemployment rate is 5%. But remember who counts as employed… anyone doing more than one hour of work per work… yeah, those people are gonna help prop up house prices!
For a start, consider that today about 28% of all employed people work part-time.
In 1978, it was only about 14%.
What does that tell you? It tells you there has been a relative increase in people working part-time. That much is obvious.
What else does it tell you? Well, we’re not a labour force analyst so we can’t say for certain. But we can take a stab at a guess or two…
Granted, more flexible working arrangements have played a part. But we’ll guess it also means that people are now counted as part of the permanent labour force when previously they weren’t… therefore distorting Australia’s unemployment rate.
You can see that distortion in the number of unemployed people and the number of people not in the labour force. Both these numbers have only increased by about 50% over the past thirty-three years.
In normal circumstances you’d expect those numbers to increase as the population increases.
But while there has been an increase it has been nowhere near as much as the increase in the number of people in the workforce. Those employed full-time has more than doubled. But importantly, the number of people working part-time has increased more than three-fold.
In other words, fiddling of the employment statistics is giving a distorted impression of the strength of the Australian economy.
Both of these facts tell you it won’t take a major shock to interest rates or unemployment to knock house prices down. All it will take is a marginal move in either – thanks to the increased leverage from low interest rates.
Nothing I’ve written will stop the spruikers from carping on about the invincibility of the Australian housing market. House prices are falling around their ears, yet still they make the same old tired excuses.
But really, the spruikers must learn to do better. And if they insist on egging on the mainstream press to write anti-bubble stories, they should give them better and more convincing material than rubbish about “marvellous water views”.
Cheers.
Kris Sayce
For Money Morning Australia


{ 39 comments }
← Previous Comments
Jessica actually said “Most of the population is concentrated in a few capital cities with often marvellous water views.”
So in the world according to Jessica, at minimum of 25% of the population of Australia has fabulous water views!
There you go, how on earth could you have a bubble with so many fab water views?
Its impossible I scream……gagging on my psych meds!
Adrian @ 4 Your comments
“I was recently told at work that there are only two types of people in life: “owners and rents”.Renters know how if feels to [be] treated as a lower form of life.” Prove yet again we are in a massive speculative bubble ready to burst. Can you honestly tell me it is sane to judge the worth of your fellow man on those merits? you and co need your heads examined !! the mass greed is deluding you all. Its quite scary really that you can honestly believe such BS but then mass delusions have proved through out history to create complete insanity. We are fortunate to have some great minds out there warning us with crystal clear evidence and reasoning as to why houses have become an extremely risky investment and can fall dramatically in value. The propaganda the younger gen are fed and pressures they are put under from the ill informed do gooders, family and friends encouraging them to commit themselves to such exorbitant amounts of debt that could very easy lead to their financial ruin to support their retirement returns and house values is down right cruel.
“Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.”
Charles MacKay, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds
There is a lot of talk about the Residential market however few comment on the Commercial market. The Commercial market (here in SE QLD) is cold and on a slab with a tag on its toe. For me that means new jobs aren’t being created, the jobs contribute to GDP and pay for the credit cards, mobile phones, cars and residential mortgages not to mention the commercial investors of the commercial properties (and possibly some super funds) are, or going to be, taking losses.
I’ll take a punt and say most homeowner/investors probably don’t know what it’s like to take a SIGNIFICANT capital loss so for them it’s like trying to convince them 3weeks ago that a giant tsunami would take out japan, creating a potential nuclear disaster.
My take… the higher the property market rises the further they have to fall –simple. If, When, Why… seriously –doesn’t matter. Remember, unlike other forms of ‘investment’, you can’t put a stop-loss on a house, and it’s extremely difficult to write a short on your position.
Hello ‘Abby’,
Now that you have made your point, go wash your mouth out with soap. LOL!!!!!
Hello Kris Sayce and staff.
You wrote that you are married to a Teacher, both of my parents were state school Teachers, so I know what she is going through. It is really mentally exhausting. Now back to my comment on your topic…..
You are right about how the government has distorted the figures of unemployment, in fact, I would say it is alot higher than we think. Let me explain….
I am not the only one in this situation in fact alot of people are in the same situation as me. I was lucky enough to buy a house many many, many, many, many years ago so my home loan doesnt really affect me because my mortgage isnt big enough. Now, my wife has not worked for 12 years but she has NEVER been classed as unemployed by the Australian Government for those 12 years, yes thats right you read right, she is not counted as unemployed. She was and still is a stay at home Mum for our 3 children all of these years. I wish she could go back to work during these years but she didnt want to, so that is her right these days to stay home if she wants because she is a Mother with 3 children. (2 working parents would not have liked what I just typed. So many 2 working parents are against us and people like us, they say that she should work. Its amazing how so many 2 working parent families say that). The government said to me because we are receiving Family assistance we cannot claim Newstart allowance.(Unemployment benefits),You can only claim one or the other. Therefore she is not on their records. We choose to have Family assistance because it pays a little more than Newstart allowance. As you can see, the government is basically saying, here is a little more money for Family assistance and keep your mouth shut and dont say that you are unemployed.
Family Assistance goes by how much I earn (or total house hold income). She and the children are dependant on my income. No wonder people are breaking up for the convenience of getting more money from the Goverment and still secretly living together. (Oh yes, that is happening). 2 single parents get paid more. Just like 2 single unemployed people get more unemployment benefits. The system is so wrong.
There are so many parents out there in the same situation, I know because I know so many, being a parent myself. But most are either renting or have big mortgages because they couldnt buy property many many years ago. So they are really struggling. I will be honest with you. I only earn around $47,000 per year before tax stacking shelves on night shift (10pm-6am 5 nights per week) for the biggest (S)upermarket chain in Australia. Thats around $740 per week after tax. We get $620 per fortnight from family assistance, tax free. That brings our weekly income to $1050 per week after tax. Its not bad since we will have our home payed off this year. In fact the money we get from the government is and has been paying our house off because we didnt have a big mortgage. The stupid thing is that if my wife goes to work part time and earns $300 after tax then most of our Family assistance will be cut, so she would be working for nothing vertually when you add into we may have to pay someone to look after the kids, the extra petrol etc, etc, etc. There are many, many people in the same situation but with big mortgages and they are struggling. The younger generation, (the new first home buyers) think that Interest rates are high now because they are comparing them to when they were low. They have not experienced 12 to 18% mortgages. It will get high again and they wont be able to cope, even on good salaries. Even when interest rates go up a further 2% (and of course they will) they said they will be forced to sell. I have always gone with the rule that, if you cannot afford your mortgage if interest rates hit 14% then dont get a mortgage. They can very, very easily get back to that and they will for sure and more during a 25 year loan term.
The Goverment is now reviewing the average weekly income. The average weekly income is fairly high because the Mining boom salaries have bumped it right up. The Government has finally seen this and they said that they will work the figures out without the mining sector. This was a while ago and they havn’t said anything since. Strange that, isnt it?????????? They know we are in trouble when the mining boom ends, and it will. China is starting to slow so of course we will then slow. When the mining boom ends, watch out big time, we will go backwards and down in a big way. Dont think this boom will last forever because it never does, that is why it is called a Boom, get ready soon for the BUST.
At work we have cleaners who are from India and Sri Lanka working for alot less than the minimum wage and some are getting cash in hand taking jobs away from Australian residents. These people are not Australian citizens so they can be paid less. Even although some may not be paying tax, they actually do because almost everything these days has GST on it. The government wins again. The government also wins because the majority of overseas people especially from India are University students. They seem to get into Uni easier than our own Australian residents because they pay 3 times as much or more for the course they are going to study. The government wins again. When they finish University the Government says sorry we have no jobs for you (But thanks for your money from your rich relatives) and dont pass them for Australian residency then sends them home again. They dont receive a health care card or any other benefits like our Australian students because they are not Australian citizens. I have seen this for many, many years and I know that this is a fact because I know and have known so many overseas people, mainly from India, Sri Lanka and Africa. The government then has the cheek to then tell Australia that we need skilled workers here in Australia. Well if they let our people have a go of getting into University over someone who is paying 3 times or more from overseas then sending them back overseas then we wouldnt have a shortage here. Its all about money to the government. They only look at the now and not the future. Since they are not thinking of the future they are just leaving the country in more of a mess for the next government and it happens over and over again untill one day (and it will be soon) it will all be downhill for us all. Thats what you get when you put money first and people second.
Good bye Mining Boom, Good bye Australia. (Till the next Mining Boom).
Abby – I think your BS detector needs a tune up. Still you have become more civil lately, that’s a blessing.
The Australian residential “market” is a Ponzi scheme, but it’s a Ponzi scheme that enjoys bipartisian support in Canberra. And as far as Canberra is concerned, it’s a Ponzi scheme that is now “too big to fail”. That’s why the bubble won’t burst. At the first signs of distress, Glenn Stevens will slash interest rates, Wayne Swan will pump up the FHBG, or entice more foreigners, etc. Whatever it takes to keep the music playing. In fact, one could argue the Australian economy itself has a Ponzi scheme quality. Ever-increasing debt and immigration are now essential to keep the game going. So whilst I agree with your analysis, I’ll have to disagree with your conclusions.
Delusions and Illusions
Jan 2011.
There is a strange idea that seems to have afflicted even normally sound thinking citizens of our two isolated countries in the Sth Pacific, namely Australia and New Zealand. Australians in particular seems to have decided they are independent of the rest of the world, because their country is blessed with enormous natural wealth that will keep them living in comfort, while a large chunk of the rest of the developed world, is being forced to face up to the reality of an emerging new world. In particular the current Labor Govt and its predecessors namely Hawke, Keating etc; bask in royalties and taxes from its mining sector, and the wealth that’s works its way through the economy in so many different ways, were/are masters of illusion. Economic theory, what there is, which isn’t much; is based on Keynes teaching that swept the capitalistic world for many years, but is largely discredited by conservative present day thinkers.
The view from England; was from the birth of its various colonies, one of arrogance towards its most distant colonies, which in retrospect seems quite normal. This was particularly on display during WW1 and the 1929 depression. Then came WW11, and the very difficult times being experienced in Britain, from German bombing during the ‘Battle of Britain’. The English (Churchill) attitude was largely predicated by the Australian fear of occupation by the, at the time, rampant J@panese military as they initially carved out a new Empire in the Sth. Pacific. It was during this time 1939-41 that the conservative Australian PM; Menzies had the grand illusion that he could with various smart moves replace Winston Churchill, and become the PM of Great Britain.
After the defeat of Menzies at the polls, the Australian Labor PM Curtin and NZ Labor PM; Fraser both had differing attitudes to the looming threat, of the J@panese conquering military successes, which loomed ever larger. The NZ approach was far more sanguine than Australia, but they were just as aware of the perilous position both countries were in. Perhaps the Australian attitude was also partially because of its all white Australia policy, the occupation by a nation of yellow skinned people, would have shattered the illusion of white superiority so carefully nurtured. Actually the J@panese had already shattered that image of white superiority with its recent defeat of Russia, this was real not an illusion?
By comparison in NZ that illusion was first shattered by the Treaty of Waitangi, which had been forced on the whites by the Maori wars. The English had found it too difficult to subjugate the Maoris with war, far better the illusion of a treaty they didn’t honor anyhow. The resurgence of its indigenous peoples, after the initial decimation by the wars and the imported diseases, and the great rate of attrition through grog and disease was no illusion. What did it matter to have a treaty with a people that would be exterminated eventually without war, the Maoris turned that into an illusion, and now we have the strong browning of NZ? (Inter racial marriage)
NZ also differed from Australia, where the indigenous peoples had been so badly treated. The illusion of racial superiority in NZ had been dented, but not entirely shattered. The exploits of the J@panese in China was also an eye opening knowledge, forced on both countries populations, by the images on movie screens depicting J@panese brutality. The sudden understanding of the Asian mans possible potential was difficult for Australians, and frightening? Fear of the future at that time was real not an illusion, but that tendency towards illusions seems to be a natural characteristic, not a temporary aberration of the character, that persists to this day.
Perhaps the perception freely acknowledged from Whitehall in the UK, that Australia was merely a huge island that they had settled with convicts, and dissident Irish laborers, was of little consequence. On the other hand NZ had been settled by free settlers dominated by immigrants from Great Britain, this was well known in Australia, and had some legitimacy in the UK. Perhaps this was the basis for the animosity between the two govts; Australia and the UK. Whatever the reasons the Australian instinct for illusion seems to have grown steadily during this WW11 period, and has greatly expanded ever since?
What I choose to call the grand Australian illusion was first Menzies personal ambition, but then the dream by the labor govt in Australia to take over after the war, countries that had been colonies of great European colonizing countries. Among them Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Borneo and all of the surrounding small islands of the Sth Pacific, and possibly up to Malaya, Singapore and the Philippines. So these countries were to have local white skinned supremists instead of bigoted English, Dutch, French and Yanks or yellow skinned Japs?
The illusion was that Australia with NZ; the only white countries in the Sth Pacific area, would have a large population under their control, but NZ was to be rather passive in the partnership just a rubber stamp really. Australia’s grand illusion was that it could see itself aligned with the passive help of NZ; at the head of a large trading group, with control of these Asian peoples, who would in the future be the front line defense against future Chinese and/or J@panese ambitions. At the time the population of Australia was a mere seven-eight million and NZ not much more than one-one and a half million including a resurging Maori population?
Herein are my instinctive comments of our continuing illusions, including the first financial ride on the sheep’s back for ANZ, and now the mining industry for Australia? The period is from and during WW11!
The current NZ approach is more pragmatic because it has to be, the Kiwis don’t have so many illusions because of their exposure to multiple recessions over the last three decades, that haven’t affected Australia to the same extent. It is surprising however just how often one speaks to a Kiwi who has a blinkered view of the future, and many are quite sure their future is with Asia, or more specifically China. The illusion is that they believe in that future as being as one of equals! That’s a grand ANZ illusion, the Yellow man looking after the White man some hope, rather it would be something like the Chinese are doing in West Africa right now. Taking everything and giving little, but in ANZ thinking that’s different, because we are basically white dominated countries!
The most memorable illusion was in believing that the mother country (England inter ww1 and ww11) was the one that would nourish us indefinitely, even to her own detriment. Gallipoli should have shattered that illusion but it didn’t? Then the many instances of political subterfuge created by Churchill who was the architect of Gallipoli anyhow, were so many as he initially conned ANZ; to denude their countries of our own prime fighting men, in spite of the danger from J@pan in the South Pacific. Australia in the form of then Prime Minister Robert Menzies; was so infused with dedication to the British, and Empire he forgot or avoided many times the obvious truth. The mother country wasn’t capable of suckling its off spring, and wanted to use our troops in Tobruk, and then on to Crete. The Anzacs were in the front line in the defeat of the Rommel juggernaut and had three companies in the Montgomery’s eighth army that was victorious at Al Alamein. Our military were placed anywhere at Churchill’s behest often without the courtesy of ANZ even being notified. Our men and women, died for England’s salvation not for their home countries?
Menzies and his war cabinet were completely deluded, by Churchill and his love of war, and readiness to sacrifice lives, especially from forces sourced from the dominions. They were totally deluded in their belief in the power of the mother country or what they thought was the case, but was it just an illusion. Peter Fraser the NZ Prime Minister at that time was supportive of Menzies, although a bit tempered by their different political persuasions. Both countries were treated as merely irrelevant distant off spring, and Churchill was the master of illusions as well as a very competent puppet master.
As the successor to Menzies, Curtin the wartime Australian labor leader; discovered Churchill placed ANZ as the lowest priority for succor, and India on a far higher level. The Sth Africa PM General Smuts and the Canadian PM; McKenzie King were able to get assurances their countries, were both accorded a higher relevance than ANZ. Sadly our naiveté in accepting Churchillian illusions seems to have been entrenched; in the thinking of our leaders from the antipodes.
After the war another significant illusion was created when both countries rode high on the sheep’s back, Australia with its Merino wool producing flock and New Zealand with its Nth Island Southdown Cross flock, and its premier lamb meats, but their lower quality annual wool output. WW11 had just ended and the world wanted/needed to buy our products. Huge capital investments had been made (Starting pre-depression) to develop what we comfortably believed was our future, feeding and clothing the world.
Suddenly these two isolated countries were needed as they had never been needed in peace time before, and we thought it would go on forever. What a time it was, we kids used to roam the paddocks, and collect any wool that had been left tangled on barbed wire fences by the sheep while in full fleece, prior to shearing, we earned good pocket money.
In NZ we thought the UK was going to take all of the lamb we could produce forever, and venerable old English companies, like Swifts, Borthwicks etc obviously thought so too. They had huge meat producing works everywhere ie Riverstone in Sydney; the shearing and meat contract gangs were in their own illusions, the aristocrats of the land. After the Cockies (Farmers) of course they were the real aristos!
Contract workers in both the meat and wool industries were earning way in excess of most of their working class mates, only the wharfies with their militant unions had comparable conditions. This was the truth in both countries as the union movement became ever stronger, and our leaders fed us with wonderful illusions of the future.
Periodically some of the old memories come back and one has to smile, as they merge with the differing developments over the years. Suddenly (to us) there were rumors of something that was being referred to as some sort of common market, way over there on the other side of the world. This was being envisaged, and trumpeted loudly by the media, but so what we didn’t care we had the best products in the world at the best prices. Like it or not the rest of the world would dance to our beat because we were the best, well it was a nice illusion at the time.
Then we were informed that France was going to become the major supplier for lamb in the UK as part of the common market rules, “but what about us?” we wailed and then we found that French lamb was much more expensive than ours, it was tragic in the extreme? But that couldn’t happen to the fine wool of the Merino, that was of an unsurpassed quality and none could copy that. We common workers were assured it was just a blip and only a short term hold up; the meat industry would flourish still hmmm. But suddenly it happened there were all sorts of other material created, and our Australian fine wool wasn’t holding the trump cards after all, and those Frenchmen were in the middle of it again, with their fashion etc. Wow is there any wonder we the common worker had bad feelings for those French whingers!
We were in the newspapers and the radio being exhorted to produce more for the hungry Poms, and as a 15 YO in 1950 I left college to answer the call for labor, and went out to a local meat works and asked for a job. “How old are you son”? The boss man asked.
“How old do I need to be to get a man’s job bro?” I asked.
“About 18 YO,” he replied with a grin.
“Yeah well I will be 18 YOA tomorra bro so what about a job?”
“You don’t look like 18 ta me but what the hell we are short staffed, start in the morning son, but you havta join the union ya know this is a union shed, cost ya two bob a week,” pay before ya start in the morning.
Four years later when I really was 19 YO several of us Maoris got offered jobs in Bendigo Victoria, more pay and return fare paid if we stayed for 12 months. For every extra person we took with us we got paid a five quid start up bonus. I had taken 5 with me, but another 6 came a week later, it was a nice bonus for a youth.
When the season was over, three of us went up shearing in NSW at Warialda in the north. The old Cocky who met us said, “Hi fellas Kiwi’s hey? Whats it like over home nowadays I am a Kiwi too, but been here forty five years?”
“Yeah well it’s been a bit dry, haven’t had any rain at home for over a week, but it is raining now,” one of us said sorrowfully.
“Well we haven’t had any rain for 7 years so it’s a bit dry here too, and the biddy bids are real bad this year,” The old guy said with a laugh.
“So whats a biddy bid, do they snag up the blades?” I asked.
Well it’s time for the first run, and an ugly great flock (dirty and biddy bid infested) of Merino’s rams were first up, and in my pen there were five of those monsters, struth those things were bigger than me. I looked at them and they eyed me off, I didn’t like them, but the feeling was mutual. Anyhow I grabbed one, and the damn thing was infested with those plurry biddy bids orright, I let out a yell, “These smelly brutes are full of spikes?” and that was no illusion it was real.
The old guy just stood there and laughed all he said was, “Welcome to Aussie young fella, these are real sheep not those funny little cross bred things we have over home, can’t you do the job?”
“Obviously you have never been down in Southland, Otago especially their Border Leicester cross are giants, or Canterbury with their Down cross bred’s, but they get washed regular these things have probably never felt a decent rain. That’s why there is so much fly bow (maggots in the rear end up into the anus) and muelsing (caused by crutching and de-tailing the rear ends to clear away the shit) problems, for sure what is big over here is the flies, and they are like dive bombers compared to fighter planes back in NZ? That’s for sure; still you have to pay us double rates for this stuff, so what the hell in the long run it makes no difference to me?” I said with a cheeky grin.
I had nothing more to say, even though when I put in the opening belly cut of that first ram the shears (hand piece) just bounced back, but I said nothing and battled on. I was no gun (expert) shearer, but at home I could put out my 180 a day. Suddenly in Australia me and my mates were struggling to do 80 a day, it was damned humiliating, to hear the Aussie shearers having a great laugh at our expense. But we got our own back within two months we were the ones laughing, as the Aussies couldn’t match our tallies for the day.
We had started out in response to the call for labor and it was great then,
but suddenly we had the illusion that we were indispensable. Looking back though it was true enough at the time, but now I know it was an illusion of the times? But I never forgot such a wonderful time in my then young life!
Anyhow that was forty two years ago and I am still here in NSW, and it’s been great I am still a Kiwi at heart, but I love this country. I have travelled all over the world and there is nowhere like ANZ. This great country (Australia) is what it is in spite of the dills we have had for politicians, not because of them. The natural wealth is great, but can it last or is it like being on the sheep’s back, when we may fall off again, is it just another illusion?
The politicians (and their illusions) carry on about how we are part of Asia, and how the Chinese are going to keep us all wealthy and look after us, yeah sure just like the Poms did until they didn’t need us. I went back to the old NZ meat works, (owned by CWS in England) I had worked at five years ago after a 35 year absence, and it was a desolated wreck, not only that one, but so were at least half of the others that were once processing each over 1,000,000 lambs and sheep per year, plus beef. Where the Cockies once grew lambs there are now pine plantations, it takes less than one year to bring a lamb to market, but over ten years for the first cut, out of a well run pine plantation, and 23-25 years to reach full maturity and clear fall milling. NZ has suffered, and it is hardly surprising!
Even with the Chinese in the market here in Australia the wool clip has been in and out of trouble, but the old days are gone Australia and New Zealand fell of the sheep’s back. And the French Cockies still clamor for better money for their products, how does this new world work? We once produced the best products at the most competitive prices, but the Poms are now paying those French Cockies top dollar while our works are desolated, and the sheep country infested with radiata pine plantations. We understand the reasons for why this happened, what I am asking is why the supposed global village concept throws up so many such anomalies. In other words this global village concept still depends on the large countries and their alignments, and they will feed us little twerp’s (English attitudes) illusions as ever.
Old Winston Churchill didn’t give a damn about us when the chips were down, our men were kept fighting in North Africa to help save the Poms, and he (through his war office) refused to send them home, at Curtin’s persistent requests. Churchill was the great master of spin and illusion! Worse still the Brits; were well aware when they had conned Menzie’s-Curtin, and the Australian officials in London, the danger of war with J@pan especially for Australia was very real. They fed us with illusions that they (Brits) could and would protect us, but in truth that was like the impregnability of Singapore, and was at best an illusion of the once mighty British Empire. If it hadn’t been for the Americans we would have been in real trouble, but that was the start of the end, of the ANZ unquestioned loyalty to the mother country we finally had to grow up, and in a big hurry?
For a simple ex colonial like me when one reads the record of WW1 & 11 of English performance during both periods, he asks was the so called mighty English Empire just an illusion. It’s similar to a large grazier who has 100,000 head Merino flock, but only has the feed for 90,000 end result the entire flock starves during a prolonged drought, and sheep die because of their owner’s illusion?
There is an obvious financial realignment happening in the developed world as the cost structures are a changing, and it’s all downward. Like it or not as built home values drop within the working middle class level, the cost of the new homes will drop also. As the home values drop the material and labor costs in new homes must drop too, and as this happens mineral values must drop as well, so careful Australia, as mineral values drop so the insular dream may be shattered, and eventually we will fall in line with the rest of the developed world. This doesn’t mean a loss of market, but what it does mean is lower prices for our minerals, and greater competition from countries like Brazil. It’s true our big miners have mines etc all over the world, but that doesn’t allow for royalties being earned for Australians. But it’s a great opportunity for profit shifting if these mammoth companies were so inclined, off course they wouldn’t do that just ask them they are always truth-full just like our politicians?
One doesn’t have to be an honors economist graduate to work that out, even an old contract meat/shearer like me can see that, so why don’t we just cut out all of the spin. Vested interests try to talk up the market with the same old spin that bought the developed world to its knees, are we so stupid that we will still listen to all of that once again??? Yes we are/can and we will, just you watch us!
Over the years Labor historically has created work etc by boosting the construction industry when they win govt, and the conservatives have done the opposite, there have been no new formulas it’s the same old spin that had been served up ever since the Yank military went home, and in many cases left all of their new families behind. In years gone by it was accepted that the roll-over period from boom and bust; in the construction industry was 7-9 years.
Even as Europe and America struggle with their housing and financial problems, here in Australia we are pushing ahead with the same old techniques. Fractional banking is still thriving as did the govt first used first home buyer bait (cash contributions) to kick start the home building industry. This starts all of the same spin over again, but that’s fine we in Australia are immune and our banks are so sound just ask them. Even better the govt; via the media has told us the facts, and they have confirmed how strong our banks are, not like some of those weak pussy cat banks overseas ie; Ireland.
If our banks are so sound why did two of our major banks have to borrow extensively off the American Fed recently; is it really true how strong our banks are? What is hidden in the bank fixed assets? Are there lots of exposures to the bond market, how is fractional banking working for our banks, and why did the govt; have to guarantee the bank loans just as the Irish have done? Are our banks sitting on lots of toxic bonds that they weren’t able to sell off to the Yankee big boys during their prime? The banks in Australia also own and control the banks in the New Zealand system, in the main, and that’s not an illusion.
But don’t worry fellas the Chinese are going to keep us living high on the hog, and will keep on infinitum doing that, go on ask them they will say yes. Make no mistake the Chinese have even less concern for our welfare than Winston Churchill ever had, we are on the bulldozers back, but the damned thing might fall apart at any time, made in China and cost half the price of those produced by or for ‘Caterpillar, the Yankee company’. Also now made in China!
I have no problem with the Chinese at my age why should I care? Well sadly I do because I care for Australians and New Zealander’s all of them rich or poor… All we oldies want is for sanity to prevail, just remember all of the Asian nations in the Pacific Rim fear and hate the Chinese, and they sure hate and fear the Japanese, study the history a bit people and it’s easy to see why. For example the Vietnamese were overwhelmed by the Chinese over two millennia ago; the only country that could and did defy China, in their sphere of influence was J@pan. They successfully defied the Mongol Emperors (Occupiers) of China the only country in the area that ever did escape the Mongol embrace. (Military defeat) The Asians live in a world of reality not illusions, they know they can’t spend illusions only the peoples of the developed world can do that? Most of the Chinese peasants still bank their savings in a bottle under the bed.
America has always claimed not to have territorial ambitions, their constitution (read it to provoke interesting thoughts) works against colonialism, but they sure have world financial dominance, especially now. In a silly way perhaps I see America as like a huge company that owes the bank lots of money, as soon as their Federal Reserve can print up money the govt borrows it and guarantees the payment plus interest. It’s an interesting concept, interest on pretty paper. (Fiat money) We are consistently told of the huge American Foreign debt, but what is the sum net total after setting off the consolidated assets, if business and mercantile equity worldwide was to be factored in? Try reading just the liability side of a balance sheet and that business will look very sick!
In the start up of modern developed economies, the English had cheap child labor the Americas black slave labor, and then it was the French and Italians that had an abundance of cheap peasant labor. After them it was the J@panese and the Germans, who corralled all of the American investment, and provided cheap labor for their mercantile machines. But who really owns that machine? Then we had the AArabs and black gold, money which was invested in great chunks in US Treasury Bonds, this money helps fund the American war machine, therefore much of that money has finished up with the USA. AArab money to fight the AArabs that’s real smart that is, only in America could that happen?
But the big question where are we the diggers from down under heading, are we safe on the bulldozers, or can we fall off like we fell off the sheep’s back? We sure can and be sure when and if we do we will be right in it (bullspin), up to our necks, but that’s fine our banks are guaranteed by the govt; just like the Irish banks and then the spin will really hit the fan? For interesting reading just check out Ireland’s economy, and how it fell to their banker’s bullspin!
It’s an interesting world, but the perks that were around when I was a boy are all gone, and Capitalism is under threat just as are all of the isms of the near past/now. What I wonder happens if we could ever got back to feudalism, ruralism etc that would be a grand delusion to have nightmares about?
One final illusion from my time as a boy.
It was smoko time on the kill floor and the company had our cups of tea ready with the usual two women dispensing to us 100 meat contractors, as we filed in.
This was a service only for the contractors, not the laborers, but here’s a funny anecdote from the past. In NZ of the contract teams over 70% were Maoris in either the shearing or meat gangs, but for the laborers or low paid workers the ratio was reversed 80% were whites and Maori share was less than 10%, the rest was made up of new comers to NZ; all colored. In other words it was the Maoris who were earning the big weekly payments!
We were all seated and eating when suddenly the delegate (white) stood and said, “This tea they have given us is only warm; we cannot work after drinking this slop so it’s no work for the rest of the day, have a shower and go home boys”
I was only a fifteen YO so had no idea what he was on about, but I had never been shy to speak up, so I stood and asked, “Whats wrong wiz the tea Bro I have drunk mine and I feel ok?”
“That’s ok sonny you don’t count the rest of us can’t work though, so just sit down and shut up,” our venerable old delegate said with a demeaning sneer.
“Yeah well if I don’t count give me back the two bob union fees I have to pay every week, and I will never say another word,” then I sat down.
“I have already said sit down and shut up,” said the delegate now with the stern voice of authority,
Sounded just like the science teacher to me when we stuffed up at college, that’s why I had left for goodness sake now here was a silly-wit telling me to shut up, maybe I orta go back to school, better than this spin anyhoo!
Suddenly one of the men stood and said, “The kid is right he pays his dues same as all of us, so we want a vote not you telling us what to do?”
There was a cheer from every man in the rec room, and we duly went back to work, and that delegate never spoke to me again. But who cared he was suffering from illusions of self grandeur, but it was just a lot of adult bullspin to me, still is!!!
That delegate had illusions of his power over the company, and how he loved to use it to bash the bosses over the head has never left my memory; I have never had any illusions of self aggrandizement. But like any other human being we have the many weaknesses of man, we all have much of that we need always be aware, what is and whats not an illusion?
Mentally unbalanced people suffer from frequent illusions; first they are diagnosed as crazy, then they are given white pills to swallow, and the illusions vanish, I know because I am one who is so disadvantaged. I respectfully suggest all politicians be given a full diet of those pills, because unless they regain their senses, we are going to fall of the Asian mans back. But only then will we recover from the perpetual dose of illusions the politicians feed, we the people on.
Written by.
‘Vincent Havelund’.
Vincent what a rambling piece of incoherent codswallop ! After reading that rubbish I realised that is 5 mins of my life I will never get back. Hope I am never stuck next to you on a long haul international flight!!!
Cheers
Hugh
Let do the rational financial valuation.
Nett inflation adjusted return on asset 4%.
How does it compare to the inflation adjusted bond ?
The answer will tell you if the asset is in bubble or not ?
← Previous Comments
Comments on this entry are closed.