- Money Morning Australia

Why the Cyprus Bailout Could Set Banking Back 300 Years


Written on 20 March 2013 by Martin Hutchinson

Raiding the private deposits of <b>Cyprus’ banks</b> is foolish. The EU has now put the entire <b>Eurozone</b> on edge — not to mention the entire global economy

Even by the standards of the EU bureaucracy, raiding the private deposits of Cyprus’ banks is spectacularly foolish.

For a measly €5.8 billion, the EU has now put the entire Eurozone on edge – not to mention the entire global economy.

It revolves around something as simple as trust. And as a former banker, I can tell you that there’s no substitute for the belief that your deposits are safe and sound.

It’s a thin line, and once it’s been crossed it’s nearly impossible to repair.

Now savers in Spain, Italy and elsewhere in the Eurozone are left to wonder about the safety of their own accounts.

Here’s why savers everywhere should be concerned…

The Problem with the Cyprus ‘Bailout’

Like Ireland and Iceland, Cyprus has a banking sector that’s not only shaky but is far bigger than its overall economy, with deposits of around $90 billion, or five times its GDP.

Unlike most banking systems, more than half of those deposits are in large chunks of over €100,000, the limit of Cyprus’ deposit insurance. Indeed, about $20 billion of Cyprus’ deposits are held by the Russian mafia.

Since Cyprus’ president Nicos Anastasiades didn’t want to shut down the island’s attraction as a money haven and playground for the Russian jet-set, he agreed to a deposit tax of 6.7% on deposits up to €100,000 and 9.9% on deposits above €100,000, to satisfy the EU’s demand of 5.8 billion euros part of the bank bailout.

But like most schemes designed by politicians and EU bureaucrats, this one has huge flaws, including the fact it angered Russian president Vladimir Putin. Even at this level, with much of the money coming from Cyprus’ modestly well-off citizens , Putin described it as ‘unfair, unprofessional and dangerous.’

But the main flaw isn’t about Putin. It has to do with the idea of deposit insurance itself.

Under a separate scheme introduced by the EU after the 2008 financial crash, deposits under €100,000 are insured by the Cyprus government.

Of course, the ‘tax’ on deposits is a supposedly clever way to get around this without the Cyprus government itself defaulting. However, all this little trick does is call into question deposit insurance throughout the EU and, indeed, worldwide.

That’s why this tiny country, with a population of only 800,000 and $17 billion in GDP, has roiled the world markets – it attacked the central principle of deposit insurance.

After all, if governments can just seize deposits by means of a ‘tax’ then deposit insurance is worth absolutely zippo.

Meanwhile in Cyprus, there were a number of alternatives to breaking this underlying bond of trust. The banks have some bond debts outstanding, which certainly should have been written down before the deposits were attacked. In fact, the tax is an attempt to avoid this, and should be resisted on that ground alone.

Instead, because the large deposits are so big, you could raise the required €5.8 million simply by a 15% tax on large deposits – but that would make Putin REALLY angry (he personally may or may not have money in Cyprus, but lots of his friends do).

They could also write down Cypriot government bonds, but because the banking system is relatively so huge the write-off would have to be a big one. To get €5.8 billion it would take more than a 50% write-down.

In the big picture, Cyprus doesn’t matter much, unless EU incompetence and the recalcitrance of its own politicians makes it leave the euro altogether, in which case that currency unit yet again faces the prospect of break-up.

Who Can You Trust?

But in this case, the effect on global deposit insurance systems is much more important.

Deposit insurance was first invented in the United States during the Great Depression as a means to reassure savers about the solvency of banks, a third of which had just gone belly-up. It worked beautifully.

Americans trusted the federal government (at least, they did back then), so once deposit insurance was in place savers came to have complete trust in the banking system.

Unfortunately, that same trust had a very bad effect on the banking system itself.

From leverage ratios of $4-5 of assets to $1 of capital in the 1920s, banks leveraged themselves ad infinitum, having leverage ratios of $10-12 of debt to $1 of capital in the 1970s, and up to $30 of assets to $1 of capital in 2008.

Even today, after de-leveraging, J.P. Morgan Chase, in many ways the most solid of the big banks, had assets of $2,359 billion at the end of 2012 and tangible equity of only $146 billion – or a ratio of 16.2 to 1. As recently as 2010, JPM’s leverage was 19.3 to 1.

At those levels you can see the dangers that kind of leverage presents.

In fact, I counselled the National Bank of Croatia to this effect, when they were designing their deposit insurance system in 1996-97, advising them to have insurance covering only 90% of deposits. Unfortunately the politicians in the Croatian parliament overruled us, so Croatia now has the same damaging 100% insurance as everywhere else.

So the depositor today ends up with the worst of both worlds. He can’t rely on the banks not to go bust, given their current absurd levels of leverage (which are of course encouraged by Ben Bernanke’s money printing). On the other hand, now there’s a question of whether he can rely on deposit insurance either.

If these worries become really serious, it will be devastating for the world economy. Small savers will take their money out of banks and resort to household safes and a shotgun.

If savers no longer have a solid place in which to put their money, we will have undone the financial revolution of the last 300 years, and returned to a world in which Samuel Pepys didn’t trust the local goldsmith, so buried most of his wealth in the back garden. Needless to say, that won’t do much for small business – the entire flow of finance will seize up altogether.

The solution is to do away with deposit insurance, forcing banks that want to attract depositors to hold $1 of capital for every $4-5 of assets, at most.

Eliminating Ben Bernanke and going back to a gold standard will probably be necessary too – even though that’s not likely to happen anytime soon.

But if politicians continue behaving as badly as those who designed the Cyprus bailout, the gold standard will be the only economically viable alternative.

With this ‘bailout’ all the EU has done is open up a Pandora’s Box.

Martin Hutchinson
Contributing Editor, Money Morning

Join Money Morning on Google+

From the Archives…

Can This Indicator Predict The Dow Jones Next Move?
16-03-2013 – Kris Sayce

Seven Situations to Watch in the Pacific Currency War
15-03-2013 – Dan Denning

Stock Market Warning: Next Week Could be a Blood Bath
14-03-2013 – Murray Dawes

REVEALED: One Opportunity to Escape Your Mortgage
13-03-2013 – Nick Hubble

UK Property: How You Can Buy a House For Less Than 250 Grand
12-03-2013 – Dr. Alex Cowie


Leave a Comment

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.

If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to moneymorning@moneymorning.com.au


TESTIMONIALS

"I think you're fantastic! I love to read what you write...you're so interesting and amusing and I've learned so much" -
Money Morning reader, Chris Gadd

"You guys are brilliant. I feel more relaxed about the future than ever simply because I know what is going on rather than floundering around with smoke screens and mirrors from the government and mainstream" -
Money Morning reader, Helen Carter

"Wow what can I say? I was an economically confused moron until I read your newsletter and even though I've been a subscriber for a short period I can now see how easy it is to understand, if you use common sense and can have the spin translated into everyday language. Thanks for an entertaining read." -
Money Morning reader, John

"Keep up the good independent and well thought out articles offering a view that often debunks mainstream myths." -
Money Morning reader, Craig

"I do admire your straight talking and simple analysis of the situation, I think of you as the Jeremy Clarkson of finance." -
Money Morning reader, Jeffery

openX sidebar signup form
Openx pos2
Latest Stock Market Updates
  • ^NDX4281.783+14.008 - +0.33%
  • ^FTSE6545.27+79.27 - +1.23%
  • ^AORD5312.700+123.000 - +2.37%
  • ^AXJO5338.600+127.800 - +2.45%
  • AUDUSD=X0.8143
  • USDJPY=X119.525
openX sidebar banner
Openx pos7
Iron ore leadgen
WWD dvd

World War D was billed as ‘the biggest investment summit of the decade’

It didn’t disappoint…


Absolutely mind-blowing beyond my expectations

– D.A.C. Hall


The BEST INFORMATION available,
contrary to mainstream economic reporting.

– L. Sceresini


Exciting, dynamic, passionate, informative, challenging, so professional... Brain-stretching.

– D Finlay


Click here to watch
the brand new Highlights Reel.

Blue Chips

Receive our unique and useful investments ideas straight to your inbox for FREE, enter your email to sign up:

x