Don’t Touch This Toxic IPO: Nine Entertainment Co.

If you were planning on investing in the Nine Entertainment Co. (Nine) IPO…I’d think again. The days of ‘traditional’ TV networks are numbered.

Why? Because the digital world is taking over. And there’s already one internet TV streaming company gearing up to take on all TV networks. This company is the beginning of the new TV revolution.

Furthermore, if a secret trade deal between a group of pacific nations is ratified this company will get even bigger and more profitable…

When it comes to the Nine IPO the funny thing is that in their prospectus they’ve predicted their own death.

Here’s what the prospectus says,

Nine Network is primarily reliant on generating advertising revenue from broadcasting activities. In attracting advertising revenue, FTA TV broadcasters such as Nine Network compete primarily on the basis of audience share ratings, programming content and advertising rates. With the continued development of alternative forms of media, particularly digital media, Nine Network may face increased competition for advertising revenue.

It continues,

Newer technologies, including streaming and downloading capabilities through the Internet, video-on-demand and other technologies, are increasing the number of media and entertainment choices available to audiences.

It also goes on to list other risks, such as ‘lack of popular programming content‘. To summarise it all here’s a simple translation,

‘We (Channel 9) are competing against the internet to make our money.’

Now I don’t know about you but I’d think Channel 9 are paddling up ‘that creek’ without the proverbial paddle. Their profits are at risk from the internet. In other words, online TV streaming companies.

The Secret (Useless) Trade Deal

You may have heard about a recent ‘Secret Treaty’ leaked by Wikileaks. If you haven’t, it’s a proposed trade agreement between the US, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei Darussalam.

The Wikileaks description says about it,

The chapter covers proposed international obligations and enforcement mechanisms for copyright, trademark and patent law, and includes the combined positions of all of the parties as they were by the end of August 2013.

This trade deal is to protect the profits of companies (predominately US companies). Piracy, intellectual property and industrial design protection are some of the key issues at stake.

If this treaty gets the green light it will hurt the consumer. Prices will rise. You’ll have to pay more for over the counter and prescription drugs. TV shows, music and movies will all cost more. It’s protectionism at its finest.

In its simplest form, piracy, IP theft and copyright infringement isn’t great. I’m of the opinion if you create original material you should have right to profit from it.

But at the same time I think prices should be more affordable. As it stands we already pay too much in Australia for TV, music and definitely movies.

My point is maybe the problem isn’t the piracy and infringement itself. Maybe the problem is why it’s happening in the first place.

Let me paint you a picture.

You head out to the movies. You book two tickets to see the new Hunger Games movie. At the ticket booth you shell out $19 for a ticket. You head to the candy bar. $15 for a small popcorn and coke. Of course you’re not on your own, so multiply all that by two. If you’re a family…well you get the drift.

Anyway, $68 dollars later you’re in your seat watching previews. All you can think about is the ridiculous cost even to just be there. You feel quite mad sitting there as you’ve dropped a fair bit of coin for something that could end up being crap anyway.

Now here’s the alternative.

You’ve practically got a cinema size TV’s at home. You want to watch the new Hunger Games movie. But it’s not out at the movies for another week. So? You can download a pirated copy for free from a Torrent site. You skip over to Coles while it’s downloading, grab a bottle of Coke and some microwave popcorn for about $3. You times that by…one, as that’s enough to cover everyone. You sit on the couch and start the movie pretty chuffed because you’ve saved $65.

Of course with the second option you’re breaking the law. But I’m pretty sure many of you do it anyway already.

So what’s a legal way of getting good content, at a fair price, without breaking the law?

Well I think Netflix [NASDAQ:NFLX] has it all figured out. In fact Netflix is the first legitimate internet TV streaming service, and it’s set to kill ‘traditional’ TV channels.

Netflix 101

Here’s how it works. You log into Netflix through your TV. If you don’t have a TV you can use the computer, Apple TV, Blu-ray player, Xbox, PS3, etc.

Then you just find the show you want and stream it through the screen. Its on-demand TV. Of course this isn’t particularly new. But there’s a few things that indicate it’s the only way forward for TV networks.

Part of that is Netflix now produce original content. That is they make and screen shows that you can only get on Netflix. That means, Foxtel won’t get these shows and Channel 9 definitely won’t.

As a subscriber to Netflix the cost of subscription makes Foxtel look like the rip-off it is. It’s about $9 a month. Now that’s affordable to most people. Actually it’s affordable to over 40.4 million people around the world.

Of course you’re saying now, ‘That’s great Sam, but I can’t get Netflix in Australia.’

Good point. You can’t, yet. The main reason is Australia’s less than average internet infrastructure. Simply to get the best out of Netflix you need a decent internet connection speed. So blame the government for that one…

But it doesn’t mean you can’t capitalise on Netflix’s current dominance and future dominance of internet TV streaming. They’re so dominant, Netflix alone accounts for over 31% of all internet traffic in North America. That’s more than YouTube, Facebook, and iTunes combined.

When Netflix does come to Australia, and they will soon, it’s the end of TV stations like Channel 9. There’s simply no way they can compete with the likes of Netflix for content. So as people switch off from the likes of Channel 9, watch their profits fall away.

To me the Nine Entertainment Co. IPO looks toxic, and I’d avoid it at all costs. Particularly when you’ve got investable companies like Netflix that are way ahead in terms of content, innovation and technology.

Sam Volkering+
Technology Analyst, Revolutionary Tech Investor

Join Money Morning on Google+


Sam Volkering is Editor for Money Morning and its small-cap, cryptocurrency and technology expert. He’s not interested in boring blue-chip stocks. He’s after explosive investments; companies whose shares trade for cents on the dollar, cryptocurrencies that can deliver life-changing returns. He looks for the ‘edge of the bell curve’ opportunities that are often shunned by those in the financial services industry. If you’d like to learn about the specific investments Sam is recommending in either small-cap stocks or cryptocurrencies, take a 30-day trial of his small-cap investment advisory Australian Small-Cap Investigator here, or a 30-day trial of his industry leading cryptocurrency service, ‘Sam Volkering’s Secret Crypto Network’ here. But that’s not where Sam’s talents end. Sam specialises in finding new, cutting edge tech and translating that research into how the future will look — and where the opportunities lie. It’s his job to trawl the world to find, analyse, research and recommend investments in the world’s most revolutionary companies. He recommends the best ones he finds in his premium investment service, Revolutionary Tech Investor. Sam goes to the lengths of the globe and works 24/7 to get these opportunities to you before the mainstream catches on. Click here to take a 30-day no-obligation trial of Revolutionary Tech Investor today. Websites and financial e-letters Sam writes for:


One response to “Don’t Touch This Toxic IPO: Nine Entertainment Co.

  1. Nine Entertainment Co. Holdings Limited and others are formally currently under Peruvian Police Investigation for the past 60 days for crimes against us, the Yagua Amazon Indian people of Peru.

    >> Summary of Peruvian Police Investigations Report: <<
    The directors and staff of Nine Group of Companies, Mr David Liam Barr Gyngell , Stephen Derick Rice, Liam Ross Bartlett, David Bernad Colemen, Bruno Fiorentini Junior, Simon Columbia Mark Kelly, Jason Daniel Ryning, Andrew Kevin, Hoppe, Mark Alan Britt and others are being investigated by the Criminal Prosecutor of Iquitos Peru is investigating the investigation was started on the 23rd September 2013. For Falsification of documents in general, crimes against property – material damages, offence of exposure of people to danger and illicit association to commit a crime, provided for and penalized in the first paragraph of article 317, 125, 427 and 428 of the Penal Code of Peru.

    USD $2.4 Billion Class Action from us the Yagua Amazon Indian people of Peru has been issued and is about to be served against Nine Entertainment Co. Holdings Limited this coming week.

    Nine have been denounced publicly in the Peruvian Press, letters to Australian Ambassor, Australian Attorney General and ex Prime Minister Ken Rudd in August 2012. see below for more info…

    Letter to Australian Ambassador … http://danpantone.info/index.php/174-yaguas-
    letter-to-australian-embassy

    Letter to Australian Attorney General & Kevin Rudd http://danpantone.info/index.php/177-60-minutes-misrepresentation

    Carbon Contract is No Fraud and Scam: http://danpantone.info/index.php/19-ewcontent/88-yaguas-people-of-apayacu-river-asks-david-john-nilsson-to-continue

    Nine gave fraudulent documents and fake identities to ACMA and made falsehoods to avoid being prosecuted by ACMA. The Peruvian Police have this evidence to support this documents. These documents will be released soon

    NINE & its Hedge Fund share holders / directors "Apollo & OakTree" have been fully informed about these denunciations, Peruvian Police Investigations and a multi BILLION USD Class Action Writ for damages is coming their way.

    But Nine Entertainment Co. Holdings Limited have failed to declare any of this in their prospectus in the new IPO.

    Shame Shame Shame …. Is that illegal here in Australia, I ask you?

    The ASX Listing Manager will be notified Monday 25 Nov '13 with full documented proof of all these facts.

    In the best interest of the average fellow Australians we are creating a website – (it will be online Tuesday 26 Nov 2013) at http://www.AmazonIndians.info that provides this full story with all the documents both the original in Spanish and Google translated into English, where you can access our full story and all documents to verify the both the alleged criminal acts and the multi billion civil damage claim. Our new website will allow the world to view all the 100% verifiable original documentation to prove our claims against Nine and others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Money Morning Australia