Could President Trump Use Reagan’s Playbook?

Could President Trump Use Reagan’s Playbook?

Let’s apply the Ronald Reagan administration as a frame of reference to examine and compare president-elect Trump. Doing so we can see what expectations might be for the economy going forward.

Ronald Reagan came in, in 1980, and he got a lot of the Trump treatment seen today. He was considered a buffoon, a dope. What did he know? He was a Hollywood guy, how could he be President? Many said that he was unstable. That he was going to start pushing the nuclear button and start a Third World War. A lot of the things you’ve heard about Trump are exactly what they said about Reagan at the time.

He entered office with a team of advisors and did a lot of things right. He wasn’t alone. He had a lot of help from Paul Volcker, who was at the Fed at the time. It was Reagan and the Fed working together, in sync to turn the US economy around. As soon as Reagan came into office though, the US sunk in a really bad recession, one of the worst since the Second World War.

I’ve always thought it was part of the genius of Ronald Reagan that he got his recession over early. Most presidents do not make it through their terms in office without a recession. It may catch up to a President Trump, but you pull all the strings and try to avoid recession — or at least put it off as long as possible.

Some presidents have ended up having a recession late in their term and at the worst possible time. It’s exactly what happened to George Bush. We all know what happened in 2007–2008. President George W. Bush rode a six-year bubble and then it blew up literally in the last year of his administration.

Clinton had a recession at the end of his term. George H.W. Bush, had a recession in 1990, at the end of his term, which cost him re-election in 1992.

Reagan got his recession over at the beginning. He had a recession in 1981 going into 1982. Once that was done, the economy grew for seven straight years. It was one of the longest peacetime expansions in American history.

President Reagan had a great team. For over three years, from 1983 to 1986, growth in the United States was 16%. That was real growth. That’s not nominal growth. There is no inflation in that number. 16%, over 5% a year. Now, keep in mind, since 2009 and Obama being sworn in, that for the last almost eight years, average annual growth in the United States has been barely 2%.

Three ‘Big Money’ Sectors Aussie Investors Cannot Miss in 2017

China’s New Boom

Download this free report right now and discover the three sectors to watch as China’s growing population demands more Aussie products than ever before. Fill in your email address in the box below and click ‘Claim My Free Report’. PLUS you’ll get a free subscription to Money Morning.

We will collect and handle your personal information in accordance with our Privacy Policy. You can cancel your subscription at any time.

Trump and Reagan Have Different Tools Available

Taking this back to today, the Republicans will have the White House. They will also have the Senate and the House of Representatives.

The last time that was true was 1928. A lot of people might say, ‘Well, didn’t Reagan have that?’ No, Reagan took the Senate and had the White House and the Senate in 1980, but he did not have the House of Representatives. The Republicans did not get the House of Representatives until 1994.

Is Trump enough to get the animal spirits moving again? He might be. I think we have to think hard about that. That’s one of the biggest questions we’ve got. I don’t want to jump to that conclusion, but he might be. Ronald Reagan certainly did. I’ve been drawing this analogy between Trump and Reagan. Ronald Reagan absolutely got the animal spirits moving again.

Now to examine the important differences that exist between a president Reagan and president Trump.

When Ronald Reagan was sworn in, interest rates were 20%. That was the overnight rate. That’s not the long-term rate. The Fed funds rate was 20%. Interest rates had nowhere to go but down. They weren’t going to go to 30%. The country would have just rolled up in a ball and declared bankruptcy.

They were as high as they could possibly be. They had nowhere to go but down. Trump is coming in and interest rates are close to zero. They have nowhere to go but up.

Reagan had a major tailwind in the form of potentially lower interest rates. Trump is going to have a major headwind in terms of higher interest rates, the same thing with inflation. When Reagan came in, inflation was at 13%. By 1984, Volcker had got it down to around 4%. That was a massive disinflation.

In the 1980s, remember, the US had a bull stock market and a bull bear market.  Stocks and bonds were both going up. Stocks were going up because of real growth and bonds were going up because interest rates were coming down and inflation was coming down. Trump could have the opposite. Trump could have a collapsing bond market and see stocks run out of steam.

The other big difference is that when Reagan was sworn in the US debt-to-GDP ratio was 35%. This was close to the lowest it had been since the end of the Second World War. At the end of the Second World War, the US debt-to-GDP ratio was 100%. By the 70s, it had come down to around 30%. It went up a bit at the beginning of Reagan’s administration, but was around 34% when Reagan was sworn in.

Reagan had enormous fiscal space. He had enormous headroom to increase the debt-to-GDP ratio without threatening the financial solvency of the United States. When Reagan left office, the debt-to-GDP ratio was 50%. He added 15 percentage points to the debt-to-GDP ratio. He took it from 35 to 50.

The problem that is exists now is the debt-to-GDP ratio today is 100%. We’re back to where we levels seen at the end of the Second World War. Today, it’s about US$20 trillion. What is Trump going to do? Trump wants to be a big spender.

He does not have the fiscal space. The US is getting uncomfortably close to where Italy, Spain, Greece, Japan, and some of these other potentially bankrupt countries are.

He’s going to have interest rates going up. He doesn’t have inflation coming down. He’s going to have inflation going up. He doesn’t have a low debt-to-GDP ratio. He has a high debt-to-GDP ratio.

If the Fed accommodates it, you’re going to get inflation. If they don’t accommodate it, we’re going to hit the wall and go into a recession.

We now have two outcomes here, recession or inflation. Neither one of them are good.

It may have different origins, but the instability of the system and the potential for the collapse has not changed one bit because this is the snowflake avalanche. The snow on the mountainside is still there.

Maybe with Trump, it’s not snowing as hard, but the unstable mountainside is still there and it still only takes one snowflake.

All the best,

Jim Rickards,
Strategist, Strategic Intelligence

From the Port Phillip Publishing Library

Special Report: Is anyone out there topping Australian Small-Cap Investigator’s amazing track record right now? The average return across the entire buy list is 75.69%. That’s inclusive of winners and losers. Imagine having a 75.69% average gain running across every stock in your share portfolio! What’s the surprising (and strange) secret behind this figure? And what are ASI’s four ‘marquee stock picks’ for 2017? Click here for more…

Jim Rickards

Jim Rickards

James G. Rickards is the editor of Strategic Intelligence, the newest newsletter from Port Phillip Publishing. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. Jim also serves as Chief Economist for West Shore Group.

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of
wpDiscuz