Be Prepared for a Violent Fed Reversal

In today’s Money Morning…why the US Fed should have raised rates years ago…the chances of a rate rise in March…the coming u-turn…and more…

The outlook for rates has taken what I call a U-turn. There’s very little doubt that the Fed is on track to raise rates. This outlook is not in response to any particular piece of economic data or the overall economic picture. In fact, there are plenty of arguments why the Fed should not raise rates based on economic fundamentals.

However, they have a separate agenda which is that the Fed has committed, what I think will be viewed in hindsight as a historical blunder, by missing the opportunity to raise rates in 2010, 2011, 2012. That was when the economy was growing. Not strongly, but those years were the early stages of the expansion.

The economy was growing well enough then to justify rate increases. If the Fed had normalized rates in 2011–2012, between 2–2.5%, they would be in a good position today to cut rates if necessary to fight a recession. Unfortunately, they did not do that. They missed an entire cycle while experimenting with Ben Bernanke’s quantitative easing, which in hindsight will turn out to be a real mistake by the Fed.

Now they’re in the position to move rates after the eighth year into the recovery. While this has been a weak recovery, and people are still struggling with part-time employment or can’t launch careers on top of other difficulties, this recovery technically started in June of 2009. This makes for a very long recession by historic standards. More than twice as long as the average expansion since the Second World War, and comparable to the very long expansions we’ve had since 1980.

We’re closer to the end of this cycle than the beginning. The Fed is concerned that if another recession started tomorrow (and I’m not saying it will, but it could) it would have no ability to cut rates.

While they currently have rates at 50 basis points, the Fed could only do two cuts before it would be back to zero. This would force the decision to begin talking about negative interest rates. The Fed leadership wants to get rates up to 2 or 3% before any potential recession starts, just so they can cut them.

The problem is, how do you raise rates to that level? How do you raise rates to 2 or 3% without causing the recession that you’re trying to prevent? That’s what I call the Fed’s conundrum, and that’s exactly where the Fed is now. Is this a good time to raise rates? Probably not, but they are going to try to do it anyway.

The Fed has said they’re on track to raise three times this year. The market doesn’t believe it. The market is counting on maybe two rate hikes at most, but not three. My expectation right now is that the Fed will raise rates in March.

First, they have a bias towards raising rates. The Fed is not neutral. The threshold is fairly low. They feel that it’s ‘mission accomplished’ on the job front; unemployment is 4.7%, we’re continuing to create over 100,000 jobs a month in the US. That’s not the 2 or 300,000 jobs that we were creating a year to year and a half ago. It is still positive job growth, and with unemployment low and this rate in expansion, that’s ‘good enough’.

Second, the Fed is concerned about inflation. The Fed believes that monetary policy acts with a lag. This means if you think inflation is coming, and expectations are going up, you need to raise rates now because it takes about a year for increases to have impact. They don’t want to get behind the curve.

While unemployment is low, together with other factors, the Fed applies what’s called a Phillips curve for analysis. While I personally don’t put much stock in the Phillips curve, it is worth analysing to understand what the Fed does in order to forecast policy. If the Fed believes Donald Trump’s policies will be stimulative, while unemployment’s 4.7%, a standard Phillips curve for analysis would tell them that inflation is going to pick up late this year. This indicates that they should raise rates now, to stay ahead.

The Fed’s got a conventional macroeconomic reason to raise rates, which is based on a Trump stimulus. They also have a bias towards raising rates, because they should’ve raised them five years ago and didn’t. For those reasons, I put them on track now to raise rates in March.

Now, the market doesn’t expect this, or at least it is not giving that a lot of weight. The probability based on Fed funds futures is below 50%, so what the Fed will try to do over the next month or so is to steer expectations. The way they do this is leaks to the press, speeches and commentaries. Expect that to play out over the next month or so to try to get expectations up to where the rate hike’s not a shock.

Here’s where the U-turn comes in. If the Fed raises rates in March, which I expect right now, the economy is fundamentally weak.

Here you’ve got the Fed trying to lean into stimulus, biased in favour of rate hikes at late stages for the economy. The stimulus might not be that stimulating. You could have a combination of the Fed raising rates, the Trump plan not producing that much stimulus, and the Fed raising into weakness and throwing the economy into recession.

If that happens, the stock market will ‘fall out of bed’. This won’t be tomorrow, by the way; this is something I expected to play out over the course of time.

The Fed will have to have to reverse course, which they’ve done eight times since 2013. This is a recurring pattern. It will talk tough, raises rates, the market will fall out, the Fed will back off, go dovish and then apply forward guidance. You get a U-turn pattern with the stock market, with interest rate markets, etc.

My short-term expectation is the Fed will raise rates in March. My intermediate-term expectation is that the market is going to be disappointed with the stimulus, the Fed tightening is going to be at the wrong time, the stock market’s going to ‘fall out of bed’, the economy’s going to slow down, and the Fed will have to go dovish.

At that point you’re going to see rallies in bonds, rallies in gold, and a decline in the stock market. Right now we have the opposite of that. Gold has a lot of headwinds, bonds have a lot of headwinds, and the stock market obviously has been booming since the election, but all of that could reverse.

We’ve seen this movie before.


Jim Rickards,
Strategist, Strategic Intelligence

Editor’s Note: Exciting news. On Wednesday this week, we’re launching a very special limited-print run of Jim’s brand new bestselling book, The Road to Ruin.

It reveals a terrifying plan, which Jim believes policymakers and influencers intend for your money when the next crisis hits.

Jim’s managed to uncover it purely as a consequence of his high-level access and connections. As you’ll learn, the global economy is on a road to ruin.

The elites know this. And, according to Jim, they are going to deal with it in a very specific way.

This ‘way’ could give them total and absolute control over you, and every single cent of money you have, during the next financial crisis.

It’s all laid out in Jim’s new book. On Wednesday you’ll be able to claim your limited copy, along with an extra chapter specifically for Australian investors.

As long as you have a valid Australian mailing address, it’s yours. Stay tuned!

James G. Rickards is the editor of Strategic Intelligence, the newest newsletter from Port Phillip Publishing. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. Jim also serves as Chief Economist for West Shore Group.

Money Morning Australia