Have Banks Put their Needle in the Housing Bubble?

By ,

When the property market headed in only one direction — up — it almost became a national obsession.

News bulletins reported weekend auction results, as if they were a sporting contest. Each monthly, quarterly and annual gain, further reason to celebrate.

Unlike a sporting contest, though, property owners were all on the same side. Cheering on as the median prices compounded year after year.

The only people not cheering were those still trying to get onto the property ladder. For many first homebuyers, that train felt like it had left the station a long time ago.

For them, each weekend was another disappointment. Investors and overseas buyers outbidding them at auctions.

With prices peaking in parts of Sydney and Melbourne in 2017, and softening since, a sudden burst of pragmatism has unfurled itself on the market.

All of a sudden, it is a ‘market’ again. Like any other market, driven by demand and supply.

After waiting so long to get their turn, and with fewer investors to compete against — first home buyers too are re-thinking things. What’s the point in buying, if the market could still have some way to fall?

And the reason for the fall?

Free Guide: How to Invest in the Massive Infrastructure Boom. Download now.

The banks pushed back

Normally, interest rates are to blame when property prices head south. With each rate move higher, more would-be buyers decide that they will sit on the sidelines. It also makes it tougher for those already in the market.

However, property investors can’t blame the RBA this time. The RBA cash rate has not budged in 31 months.

Sure, some banks have gently nudged their variable rates higher to reflect slightly higher funding costs. But that wasn’t enough to bring the property boom down.

This time, the banks are well and truly in the firing line. Not just from the royal commission, which highlighted plenty of bad deeds.

No, this time they stand accused of turning off the credit tap. By tightening up their lending criteria, it is supposedly the banks who put their needle in the bubble.

Last Friday, though, one of the Big Four pushed back. It was Brian Hartzer, CEO of Westpac — perhaps the bank that fared best in the commission — doing some pushing. Though, ever so subtly.

Appearing before a House of Representatives economic committee, The Australian reported that Mr Hartzer has a very different view about falling property prices. He stated it was:

‘…more to do with housing supply and demand factors than with banks’ tightening credit.’

From Westpac’s viewpoint, the falls comes from a market doing what it does. That is, adjusting itself between demand and supply.

He continued:

For Westpac, approval rates have been steady, and our risk appetite hasn’t changed significantly in the last 12 months.’

However, perhaps the most telling was what he said next (again reported by The Australian):

The bigger issue is that not as many people—particularly investors—are applying for loans.’

I guess you can’t put it any more simply than that. By his reckoning, normal market forces are now back at work.

Beware of the real cost

No doubt bank bashing is one of the easiest games in town. With populism now a mainstay of politics, banks will be too easy a target to ignore with an election just months away.

The opposition has already proffered to allocate $640 million to establish a Banking Fairness Fund. The money is destined to help fund financial rights lawyers and counsellors. More specifically, an extra 200 lawyers and another 500 counsellors.

It doesn’t take much of a guess to work out who will fund it. If elected, the current opposition will put a levy on the Big Four banks, plus other financial services companies inside the ASX 100 (like Suncorp, AMP and Macquarie Bank).

Good luck to any politician going into bat for a bank right now — particularly with an election so close. No hard hat will be hard enough.

Commissioner Hayne’s report highlighted the good work these lawyers and counselors do. Especially for those who can’t afford proper legal representation.

Either way, it is a cost the banks will have to absorb. And that means passing them on — via increased interest rates — to all those who own, or want to own, property.

Westpac argue that the supply of new homes already exceeds demand. Well intentioned, or pure politicking, a levy (and therefore higher interest rates) could do more damage than good. Meaning with even less buyers, property price falls could accelerate further.

All the best,

Matt Hibbard,
Editor, Options Trader

PS: In a brand-new report titled: ‘How to Invest in Biotech Stocks’, you’ll learn how to break into one of the most lucrative investing markets in the world. Click here to download this free report.

About Matt Hibbard

The Fed Finally Admits It Is Clueless

These are the direct words from Jerome Powell at his recent ECB forum appearance, ‘We now understand better, how little we understand about inflation.’

Why Investors Can’t Afford to Ignore South East Asia and India

What do you think was the biggest factor to the pre-pandemic bull market? It’s a question I’ve been asking myself recently. If you go purely by the stats, then the logical answer has to be the FAANG stocks. This cohort of the US’s biggest tech stocks — Facebook (Meta), Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google (Alphabet) … Read More

There’s Still Plenty of Interest for Lithium

In today’s Money Morning…the Fed’s losing street cred…follow the long-term trends…good news for lithium…and more…

Will the Fed Choose Recession over High Inflation?

According to nearly 70% of leading academic economists polled by the Financial Times earlier this month, the US economy will tip into a recession next year.

Don’t Trust the Mainstream When It Comes to Crypto

It never ceases to amaze me how the sceptics always take such victory laps in any downturn — despite being wrong on the best-performing asset of the last decade.

Inflation has Peaked — and that’s Good for the Market

From here, the biggest question is just how quickly inflation falls back to a level that is acceptable for central bankers to take their foot off the monetary brake.